qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] hw/ide/sii3112: Use qdev gpio rather than qemu_allocate_irqs


From: John Snow
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/ide/sii3112: Use qdev gpio rather than qemu_allocate_irqs()
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:05:30 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1


On 3/24/20 4:43 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 23/03/2020 15:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
> 
>> Coverity points out (CID 1421984) that we are leaking the
>> memory returned by qemu_allocate_irqs(). We can avoid this
>> leak by switching to using qdev_init_gpio_in(); the base
>> class finalize will free the irqs that this allocates under
>> the hood.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> This is how the 'use qdev gpio' approach to fixing the leak looks.
>> Disclaimer: I have only tested this with "make check", nothing more.
>>
>>  hw/ide/sii3112.c | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/ide/sii3112.c b/hw/ide/sii3112.c
>> index 06605d7af2b..2ae6f5d9df6 100644
>> --- a/hw/ide/sii3112.c
>> +++ b/hw/ide/sii3112.c
>> @@ -251,8 +251,8 @@ static void sii3112_pci_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error 
>> **errp)
>>  {
>>      SiI3112PCIState *d = SII3112_PCI(dev);
>>      PCIIDEState *s = PCI_IDE(dev);
>> +    DeviceState *ds = DEVICE(dev);
>>      MemoryRegion *mr;
>> -    qemu_irq *irq;
>>      int i;
>>  
>>      pci_config_set_interrupt_pin(dev->config, 1);
>> @@ -280,10 +280,10 @@ static void sii3112_pci_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error 
>> **errp)
>>      memory_region_init_alias(mr, OBJECT(d), "sii3112.bar4", &d->mmio, 0, 
>> 16);
>>      pci_register_bar(dev, 4, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO, mr);
>>  
>> -    irq = qemu_allocate_irqs(sii3112_set_irq, d, 2);
>> +    qdev_init_gpio_in(ds, sii3112_set_irq, 2);
>>      for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>>          ide_bus_new(&s->bus[i], sizeof(s->bus[i]), DEVICE(dev), i, 1);
>> -        ide_init2(&s->bus[i], irq[i]);
>> +        ide_init2(&s->bus[i], qdev_get_gpio_in(ds, i));
>>  
>>          bmdma_init(&s->bus[i], &s->bmdma[i], s);
>>          s->bmdma[i].bus = &s->bus[i];
> 
> Looks like there is similar use of qemu_allocate_irqs() in via-ide and 
> cmd646-ide,
> and also reviewing my latest via-ide changes I spotted a silly mistake which 
> was
> obviously left in from a previous experimental version.
> 
> I'm not sure why Coverity doesn't pick up these other occurrences, however 
> I'll send
> along a patchset for this shortly.
> 

OK;

I will rescind my PR and will re-send it with your patches included.

--js




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]