qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v8 07/11] iotests: limit line length to 79 chars


From: Max Reitz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/11] iotests: limit line length to 79 chars
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:02:20 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0

On 17.03.20 01:41, John Snow wrote:
> 79 is the PEP8 recommendation. This recommendation works well for
> reading patch diffs in TUI email clients.

Also for my very GUI-y diff program (kompare).

> Signed-off-by: John Snow <address@hidden>
> ---
>  tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  tests/qemu-iotests/pylintrc   |  6 +++-
>  2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py b/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py
> index 3d90fb157d..75fd697d77 100644
> --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py
> +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py

[...]

> @@ -529,11 +539,13 @@ def pause_drive(self, drive, event=None):
>              self.pause_drive(drive, "write_aio")
>              return
>          self.qmp('human-monitor-command',
> -                 command_line='qemu-io %s "break %s bp_%s"' % (drive, event, 
> drive))
> +                 command_line='qemu-io %s "break %s bp_%s"'
> +                 % (drive, event, drive))

Can we put this value in a variable instead?  I don’t like the %
aligning with the parameter name instead of the string value.  (I also
don’t like how there are no spaces around the assignment =, but around
the %, even though the % binds more strongly.)

>  
>      def resume_drive(self, drive):
>          self.qmp('human-monitor-command',
> -                 command_line='qemu-io %s "remove_break bp_%s"' % (drive, 
> drive))
> +                 command_line='qemu-io %s "remove_break bp_%s"'
> +                 % (drive, drive))
>  
>      def hmp_qemu_io(self, drive, cmd):
>          '''Write to a given drive using an HMP command'''
> @@ -793,16 +805,18 @@ def dictpath(self, d, path):
>                  idx = int(idx)
>  
>              if not isinstance(d, dict) or component not in d:
> -                self.fail('failed path traversal for "%s" in "%s"' % (path, 
> str(d)))
> +                self.fail(f'failed path traversal for "{path}" in "{d}"')

Do we require 3.6 so that f-strings are guaranteed to work?  (I thought
we didn’t.  I’d be happy to use them.)

Max

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]