qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] hw/ide: Get rid of piix4_init function


From: BALATON Zoltan
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] hw/ide: Get rid of piix4_init function
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:07:36 +0100 (CET)
User-agent: Alpine 2.22 (BSF 395 2020-01-19)

On Tue, 17 Mar 2020, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 3/17/20 2:50 PM, John Snow wrote:
On 3/17/20 6:49 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 3/17/20 11:41 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 3/17/20 10:39 AM, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
This removes pci_piix4_ide_init() function similar to clean up done to
other ide devices.

Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <address@hidden>
Reviewed-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <address@hidden>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>

Please disregard this tag (I withdraw it), I mis-read the pci variable
was not assigned.


Is there an issue you've noticed, or you are just no longer certain
enough to give an RB?

I asked Zoltan there why he was reassigning 'pci' and he replied here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg63324.html

I don't know enough the PCI API (and don't have time this week to dig into it) to check how pci->devfn is used (is it populated by a pci_create() call?).

   pci = pci_create_simple_multifunction(pci_bus, PCI_DEVFN(10, 0),
                                         true, TYPE_PIIX4_PCI_DEVICE);
   ...
+   pci = pci_create_simple(pci_bus, pci->devfn + 1, "piix4-ide");
   ...
   pci_create_simple(pci_bus, pci->devfn + 2, "piix4-usb-uhci");

What annoys me is here -------^^^^^^ I don't know if reassigning the pci variable can have an impact, so as I am not confident I prefer to withdraw my review tag.

OK, I did not know that's what you were asking about and did not notice this could be a problem. To avoid any doubt I'll send a new version to avoid this shortly.

Regards,
BALATON Zoltan

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]