[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 for-5.0 0/7] block-copy improvements: part I
From: |
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 for-5.0 0/7] block-copy improvements: part I |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:09:59 +0000 |
ping
19.12.2019 12:01, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> ping. Series applies on current master
>
> 27.11.2019 21:08, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> This is a first part of my
>> [RFC 00/24] backup performance: block_status + async
>>
>> Patches are mostly separate by their idea, but sending them all in
>> separate is inefficient.
>>
>> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (7):
>> block/block-copy: specialcase first copy_range request
>> block/block-copy: use block_status
>> block/block-copy: factor out block_copy_find_inflight_req
>> block/block-copy: refactor interfaces to use bytes instead of end
>> block/block-copy: rename start to offset in interfaces
>> block/block-copy: reduce intersecting request lock
>> block/block-copy: hide structure definitions
>>
>> include/block/block-copy.h | 57 +-----
>> block/backup-top.c | 6 +-
>> block/backup.c | 27 +--
>> block/block-copy.c | 379 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> block/trace-events | 1 +
>> 5 files changed, 316 insertions(+), 154 deletions(-)
>>
>
>
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH v2 for-5.0 0/7] block-copy improvements: part I,
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <=