[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Priority of -accel
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: Priority of -accel |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Jan 2020 17:25:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 |
On 13/01/20 17:17, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Perfect opportunity to change the default to something more useful.
I am not sure acutally if it's that more useful, now that we have
sanctioned qemu-kvm as the fast alternative.
Particularly it would be confusing for qemu-system-x86_64 to use
hardware virtualization on Linux, but not on other operating systems
where the accelerators are not stable enough.
Paolo
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), (continued)
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Christophe de Dinechin, 2020/01/07
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Paolo Bonzini, 2020/01/07
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Thomas Huth, 2020/01/07
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Christophe de Dinechin, 2020/01/07
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Peter Maydell, 2020/01/07
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Kevin Wolf, 2020/01/08
- Re: Priority of -accel, Markus Armbruster, 2020/01/13
- Re: Priority of -accel,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- Re: Priority of -accel, Markus Armbruster, 2020/01/14
- Re: Priority of -accel, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/01/14
- Re: Priority of -accel, Christophe de Dinechin, 2020/01/14
- Re: Priority of -accel, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/01/14