[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bugfix ping2] Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fix qcow2_can_store_new_dirty_bitm
From: |
Max Reitz |
Subject: |
Re: [bugfix ping2] Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fix qcow2_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Dec 2019 17:30:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 |
On 02.12.19 15:09, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Hi again!
>
> Still forgotten bug-fix :(
>
> Is it too late for 4.2?
Sorry. :-/
Yes, I think I just forgot it. I don’t think it’s too important for
4.2, so, well, it isn’t too bad, but... Sorry.
> I can't imagine better test, and it tests exactly what written in
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712636
>
> (Hmm, actually, I doubt that it is real use-case, more probably it's a bug in
> management layer)
>
> So, take this with test or without test, to 4.2 or 5.0.
I was thinking of seeing whether I could write a quicker test, but of
course we should take the patch either way.
Max
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [bugfix ping2] Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fix qcow2_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2019/12/02
- Re: [bugfix ping2] Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fix qcow2_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap,
Max Reitz <=
- Re: [bugfix ping2] Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fix qcow2_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap, Max Reitz, 2019/12/09
- Re: [bugfix ping2] Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fix qcow2_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap, Eric Blake, 2019/12/09
- Re: [bugfix ping2] Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fix qcow2_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap, Max Reitz, 2019/12/10
- Re: [bugfix ping2] Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fix qcow2_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap, Max Reitz, 2019/12/10
- Re: [bugfix ping2] Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fix qcow2_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap, John Snow, 2019/12/10
- Re: [bugfix ping2] Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fix qcow2_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2019/12/11