qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 07/16] libqos: enforce Device Initialization order


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/16] libqos: enforce Device Initialization order
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 20:48:31 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0

On 22/10/2019 17.48, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 02:15:53PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 19/10/2019 08.38, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> According to VIRTIO 1.1 "3.1.1 Driver Requirements: Device
>>> Initialization", configuration space and virtqueues cannot be accessed
>>> before features have been negotiated.  Enforce this requirement.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>>  tests/libqos/virtio.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/libqos/virtio.c b/tests/libqos/virtio.c
>>> index 4f7e6bb8a1..2593996c98 100644
>>> --- a/tests/libqos/virtio.c
>>> +++ b/tests/libqos/virtio.c
>>> @@ -13,23 +13,33 @@
>>>  #include "standard-headers/linux/virtio_config.h"
>>>  #include "standard-headers/linux/virtio_ring.h"
>>>  
>>> +/* Features must be negotiated before config space or virtqueue access */
>>> +static void check_features_negotiated(QVirtioDevice *d)
>>> +{
>>> +    g_assert_cmphex(d->features, !=, 0);
>>> +}
>>
>> Isn't it "legal" to negotiate 0 feature bits, too (for legacy devices)?
> 
> Yes, it's possible for Legacy devices.  If someone ever does that
> they'll need to extend this code, but it's unlikely so I'd rather not
> complicate this.

Could you please add at least a comment here with that explanation?

 Thanks,
  Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]