qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SeaBIOS] Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] bootdevice: FW_CFG interface for LCHS v


From: Sam Eiderman
Subject: Re: [SeaBIOS] Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] bootdevice: FW_CFG interface for LCHS values
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 18:19:34 +0300

Sure!

Philippe withdrew his R-b on 7/8, as I explained 7/8 is fine (only
need to remove a bad comment) the problem was in the tests 8/8 -
should I include the original R/b?

I guess all other 1-6 are fine to add R/b...

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 6:07 PM John Snow <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/16/19 10:55 AM, Sam Eiderman wrote:
> > Thanks for the detailed comment Laszlo,
> >
> > Indeed my e-mail has changed and I only received replies to the
> > commits where I added this new mail in the S-o-b section, should of
> > added in all of them.
> >
> > So as you said it, the problem was actually in using qfw_cfg_get_u32
> > which assumes the value is encoded LE and has an additional
> > le32_to_cpu, should have used qfw_cfg_get directly like
> > qfw_cfg_get_file does.
> >
> > Regarding qfw_cfg_get_file - I wrote this code when this function did
> > not exist yet, I think it was added 6 months ago. In any case, I will
> > use it instead.
> >
> > Thanks for this.
> >
> > I will resubmit this entire commit series:
> > * I will only change code in the last commit (tests)
> > * I will remove a comment which is now not true anymore
> > * I will add my new email in S-o-b
> >
> > Sam
> >
>
> Philippe gave me a verbal tut-tut for not including his review tags in
> my last pull request; when you re-spin could you be so kind as to
> include any that still apply?
>
> --js



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]