qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 4/5] iotests: Skip "make check-block" if QEMU does not suppor


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] iotests: Skip "make check-block" if QEMU does not support virtio-blk
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 13:27:47 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0

On 14/10/2019 13.21, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 11.10.2019 um 16:50 hat Thomas Huth geschrieben:
>> The next patch is going to add some python-based tests to the "auto"
>> group, and these tests require virtio-blk to work properly. Running
>> iotests without virtio-blk likely does not make too much sense anyway,
>> so instead of adding a check for the availability of virtio-blk to each
>> and every test (which does not sound very appealing), let's rather add
>> a check for this at the top level in the check-block.sh script instead
>> (so that it is possible to run "make check" without the "check-block"
>> part for qemu-system-tricore for example).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  tests/check-block.sh | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/check-block.sh b/tests/check-block.sh
>> index 679aedec50..7582347ec2 100755
>> --- a/tests/check-block.sh
>> +++ b/tests/check-block.sh
>> @@ -26,10 +26,24 @@ if grep -q "CFLAGS.*-fsanitize" config-host.mak 
>> 2>/dev/null ; then
>>      exit 0
>>  fi
>>  
>> -if [ -z "$(find . -name 'qemu-system-*' -print)" ]; then
>> +if [ -n "$QEMU_PROG" ]; then
>> +    qemu_prog="$QEMU_PROG"
>> +else
>> +    for binary in *-softmmu/qemu-system-* ; do
>> +        if [ -x "$binary" ]; then
>> +            qemu_prog="$binary"
>> +            break
>> +        fi
> 
> Wouldn't it be better to check the availability of virtio-blk here, so
> that if the current binary doesn't support it, we keep searching and
> maybe pick up a different binary that supports it?

That's a good idea, indeed, but then I also need to adjust the code in
the "check" script accordingly.

> Or actually, should we work with a whitelist?

I don't think that a hard-coded list will work well: Since we introduced
the Kconfig build system, it's now possible for example to also build an
qemu-system-aarch64 binary that does not contain any of the boards that
support virtio. So while virtio-blk is available by default in
qemu-system-aarch64, some builds might not contain it.

 Thomas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]