[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v3 2/8] iotests: Prefer null-co over null-aio
|
From: |
John Snow |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v3 2/8] iotests: Prefer null-co over null-aio |
|
Date: |
Tue, 20 Aug 2019 17:05:26 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 |
On 8/19/19 4:22 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 19.08.19 22:18, Max Reitz wrote:
>> We use null-co basically everywhere in the iotests. Unless we want to
>> test null-aio specifically, we should use it instead (for consistency).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <address@hidden>
>> Reviewed-by: John Snow <address@hidden>
>
> Hm, sorry, I just noticed that I probably should have dropped this R-b. :-/
>
> (I mean, apart from the rebase conflict, nothing has changed, but still.)
>
> Max
>
It's fine.
- [Qemu-block] [PATCH v3 0/8] iotests: Selfish patches, Max Reitz, 2019/08/19
- [Qemu-block] [PATCH v3 1/8] iotests: Add -display none to the qemu options, Max Reitz, 2019/08/19
- [Qemu-block] [PATCH v3 2/8] iotests: Prefer null-co over null-aio, Max Reitz, 2019/08/19
- [Qemu-block] [PATCH v3 3/8] iotests: Allow skipping test cases, Max Reitz, 2019/08/19
- [Qemu-block] [PATCH v3 4/8] iotests: Use case_skip() in skip_if_unsupported(), Max Reitz, 2019/08/19
- [Qemu-block] [PATCH v3 5/8] iotests: Let skip_if_unsupported() accept a method, Max Reitz, 2019/08/19