[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH-for-4.1 v7 1/1] hw/block/pflash_cfi01: Add missi
|
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH-for-4.1 v7 1/1] hw/block/pflash_cfi01: Add missing DeviceReset() handler |
|
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jul 2019 18:19:42 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 |
Hi Laszlo,
On 7/18/19 9:35 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 7/18/19 8:38 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 07/18/19 17:03, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> On 07/18/19 12:48, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>> To avoid incoherent states when the machine resets (see but report
[...]>>> (3) Using OVMF IA32X64 (including the edk2 SMM stack), I've
>>> regression-tested this patch, on top of v4.1.0-rc1, with KVM. As follows:
>>>
>>> (3a) Normal reboot from the UEFI shell ("reset -c" command)
>>>
>>> (3b) Normal reboot from the Linux guest prompt ("reboot" command)
>>>
>>> (3c1) Reset as part of ACPI S3 suspend/resume
>>> (3c2) then use "efibootmgr -n / -N" to write to pflash (by virtue of
>>> setting / deleting the standardized BootNext UEFI variable)
>>>
>>> (3d1) Boot to setup TUI with SB enabled
>>> (3d2) erase Platform Key in setup TUI (disables SB)
>>> (3d3) reboot from within setup TUI
>>> (3d4) proceed to UEFI shell
>>> (3d5) enable SB with EnrollDefaultKeys.efi
>>> (3d6) reboot from UEFI shell
>>> (3d7) proceeed to Linux guest
>>> (3d8) verify SB enablement (dmesg, "mokutil --sb-state")
>>>
>>> (As an added exercise, step (3d4) triggered an "FTW" (fault tolerant
>>> write) "reclaim" (basically a defragmentation of the journaled
>>> "filesystem" that the firmware keeps in the flash, as a logical "middle
>>> layer"), and that worked fine too.)
>>>
>>> Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>
>>>
>>>
>>> (4) I plan to provide R-t-b in the evening from aarch64 KVM too, using
>>> the edk2 ArmVirtQemu firmware. Only the first two steps from (3) will be
>>> covered (no ACPI S3, no SB).
>>
>> Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>
Patchwork doesn't recognize your R-t-b tag:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1133671/
Should I change it for a Tested-by, or add as it?
Thanks,
Phil.
> Thank you a lot again for all your testing, I also noted your steps and
> will try to automate them.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Phil.
>
- [Qemu-block] [PATCH-for-4.1 v7 0/1] hw/block/pflash_cfi01: Add DeviceReset() handler, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2019/07/18
- [Qemu-block] [PATCH-for-4.1 v7 1/1] hw/block/pflash_cfi01: Add missing DeviceReset() handler, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2019/07/18
- Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH-for-4.1 v7 1/1] hw/block/pflash_cfi01: Add missing DeviceReset() handler, Laszlo Ersek, 2019/07/18
- Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH-for-4.1 v7 1/1] hw/block/pflash_cfi01: Add missing DeviceReset() handler, Laszlo Ersek, 2019/07/18
- Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH-for-4.1 v7 1/1] hw/block/pflash_cfi01: Add missing DeviceReset() handler, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2019/07/18
- Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH-for-4.1 v7 1/1] hw/block/pflash_cfi01: Add missing DeviceReset() handler,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <=
- Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH-for-4.1 v7 1/1] hw/block/pflash_cfi01: Add missing DeviceReset() handler, Laszlo Ersek, 2019/07/22
- Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH-for-4.1 v7 1/1] hw/block/pflash_cfi01: Add missing DeviceReset() handler, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2019/07/22
- Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH-for-4.1 v7 1/1] hw/block/pflash_cfi01: Add missing DeviceReset() handler, Peter Maydell, 2019/07/22
- Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH-for-4.1 v7 1/1] hw/block/pflash_cfi01: Add missing DeviceReset() handler, Laszlo Ersek, 2019/07/23
Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH-for-4.1 v7 1/1] hw/block/pflash_cfi01: Add missing DeviceReset() handler, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2019/07/22