Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v3 7/7] tests: Run the iotests during "make check" again

[Max Reitz]

On 10.05.19 15:34, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 10.05.19 06:29, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 09/05/2019 20.08, Max Reitz wrote:
>>> On 02.05.19 10:45, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>> People often forget to run the iotests before submitting patches or
>>>> pull requests - this is likely due to the fact that we do not run the
>>>> tests during our mandatory "make check" tests yet. Now that we've got
>>>> a proper "auto" group of iotests that should be fine to run in every
>>>> environment, we can enable the iotests during "make check" again by
>>>> running the "auto" tests by default from the check-block.sh script.
>>>>
>>>> Some cases still need to be checked first, though: iotests need bash
>>>> and GNU sed (otherwise they fail), and if gprof is enabled, it spoils
>>>> the output of some test cases causing them to fail. So if we detect
>>>> that one of the required programs is missing or that gprof is enabled,
>>>> we still have to skip the iotests to avoid failures.
>>>>
>>>> And finally, since we are using check-block.sh now again, this patch also
>>>> removes the qemu-iotests-quick.sh script since we do not need that anymore
>>>> (and having two shell wrapper scripts around the block tests seem
>>>> rather confusing than helpful).
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
>>>> ---
>>>>  tests/Makefile.include      |  8 +++----
>>>>  tests/check-block.sh        | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>>>  tests/qemu-iotests-quick.sh |  8 -------
>>>>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>>>  delete mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests-quick.sh
>>>
>>> Can I interest you in a Makefile target that explicitly excludes
>>> check-block?  I run the iotests anyway, but I also run make check.
>>> Running some iotests twice would be a bit pointless.
>>
>> Can't you simply run
>>
>>  ./check -qcow2 -x auto
>>
>> instead?
> 
> I don’t run just qcow2 tests.  I run qcow2, qcow2 with compat=0.10,
> qcow2 with refcount_bits=1, raw, nbd, qed, vmdk, vhdx, ...  A lot.
> 
> So for which of the protocol/format combinations do I exclude the auto
> group?  check-block.sh says it runs raw, qcow2, qed, vmdk, and vpc.  But
> may that not be subject to change?

Oh, and furthermore I prefer to run the tests on tmpfs.

Max

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature