[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 6/7] tests/qemu-iotests/group: R

From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 6/7] tests/qemu-iotests/group: Re-use the "auto" group for tests that can always run
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 10:50:22 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1

On 5/7/19 10:22 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 07/05/2019 15.22, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Thomas Huth <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Currently, all tests are in the "auto" group. This is a little bit 
>>> pointless.
>>> OTOH, we need a group for the tests that we can automatically run during
>>> "make check" each time, too. Tests in this new group are supposed to run
>>> with every possible QEMU configuration, for example they must run with every
>>> QEMU binary (also non-x86), without failing when an optional features is
>>> missing (but reporting "skip" is ok), and be able to run on all kind of host
>>> filesystems and users (i.e. also as "nobody" or "root").
>>> So let's use the "auto" group for this class of tests now. The initial
>>> list has been determined by running the iotests with non-x86 QEMU targets
>>> and with our CI pipelines on Gitlab, Cirrus-CI and Travis (i.e. including
>>> macOS and FreeBSD).
>> I wonder whether we should additionally limit "make check" to "quick"
>> tests.  How slow are the non-quick auto tests for you?
> I already sorted out some of the tests that run veeeery long, since the
> run time on gitlab, cirrus-ci and travis is limited. "make check-block"
> currently takes 3 minutes on my laptop, I think that's still ok?
> When I run the tests from the auto group that are not in the quick
> group, I currently get:

My personal threshold is about 5 seconds for quick, so:

> 003 1s ...
> 007 2s ...

Should these be moved to quick?

> 013 5s ...

this one is borderline

> 014 15s ...
> 015 9s ...

Definitely not quick, but if you think they are still okay for auto, I
can live with that.

> 022 1s ...

Another candidate for quick?

> 023 18s ...

Even longer than 14. Okay for auto?


Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]