[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: Remove myself as
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: Remove myself as block maintainer |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Sep 2018 09:37:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
Fam Zheng <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, 09/25 07:00, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Jeff Cody <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > I'll not be involved in day-to-day qemu development. Remove
>> > myself as maintainer from the remainder of the network block drivers
>> > (and vhdx), and revert them to the general block layer maintainership.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody <address@hidden>
>> > ---
>> > MAINTAINERS | 14 --------------
>> > 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> > index e93f79672f..6ef6932628 100644
>> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> > @@ -1982,28 +1982,22 @@ F: block/vmdk.c
>> >
>> > RBD
>> > M: Josh Durgin <address@hidden>
>> > -M: Jeff Cody <address@hidden>
>> > L: address@hidden
>> > S: Supported
>> > F: block/rbd.c
>> > -T: git git://github.com/codyprime/qemu-kvm-jtc.git block
>> >
>> > Sheepdog
>> > M: Hitoshi Mitake <address@hidden>
>> > M: Liu Yuan <address@hidden>
>> > -M: Jeff Cody <address@hidden>
>> > L: address@hidden
>> > L: address@hidden
>> > S: Supported
>> > F: block/sheepdog.c
>> > -T: git git://github.com/codyprime/qemu-kvm-jtc.git block
>> >
>> > VHDX
>> > -M: Jeff Cody <address@hidden>
>> > L: address@hidden
>> > S: Supported
>> > F: block/vhdx*
>> > -T: git git://github.com/codyprime/qemu-kvm-jtc.git block
>>
>> Does "S: Supported" make sense without an M:?
>>
>> >
>> > VDI
>> > M: Stefan Weil <address@hidden>
>> > @@ -2034,34 +2028,26 @@ F: docs/interop/nbd.txt
>> > T: git git://repo.or.cz/qemu/ericb.git nbd
>> >
>> > NFS
>> > -M: Jeff Cody <address@hidden>
>> > M: Peter Lieven <address@hidden>
>> > L: address@hidden
>> > S: Maintained
>> > F: block/nfs.c
>> > -T: git git://github.com/codyprime/qemu-kvm-jtc.git block
>> >
>> > SSH
>> > M: Richard W.M. Jones <address@hidden>
>> > -M: Jeff Cody <address@hidden>
>> > L: address@hidden
>> > S: Supported
>> > F: block/ssh.c
>> > -T: git git://github.com/codyprime/qemu-kvm-jtc.git block
>> >
>> > CURL
>> > -M: Jeff Cody <address@hidden>
>> > L: address@hidden
>> > S: Supported
>> > F: block/curl.c
>> > -T: git git://github.com/codyprime/qemu-kvm-jtc.git block
>>
>> Likewise.
>>
>> > GLUSTER
>> > -M: Jeff Cody <address@hidden>
>> > L: address@hidden
>> > S: Supported
>> > F: block/gluster.c
>> > -T: git git://github.com/codyprime/qemu-kvm-jtc.git block
>>
>> Likewise.
>>
>> > Null Block Driver
>> > M: Fam Zheng <address@hidden>
>>
>
> Block drivers without an M: naturally fall under the overall maintainership of
> block layer (Kevin&Max), so IMO keeping the statuses is fine. Maybe CURL can
> be
> degraded to Maintained, though.
Yes, get_maintainer.pl combines all applicable sections. Human readers
are left to wonder, unless they know to look for other matches.
Do we want to have a dedicated network block driver submaintainer again,
if we can find one?
Do we want to have a dedicated VHDX driver submaintainer again? Fam,
you're maintaining VMDK, could you cover VHDX as well?