qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 2/6] dirty-bitmap: add bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_di


From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 2/6] dirty-bitmap: add bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty_area
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 21:03:30 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0

03.08.2018 20:46, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
The function alters bdrv_dirty_iter_next_area(), which is wrong and
less efficient (see next commit for description).

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden>
---
  include/block/dirty-bitmap.h |  3 +++
  include/qemu/hbitmap.h       | 15 +++++++++++++++
  block/dirty-bitmap.c         |  7 +++++++
  util/hbitmap.c               | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  4 files changed, 64 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h b/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
index 5dc146abf3..c02be67564 100644
--- a/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
+++ b/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
@@ -100,6 +100,9 @@ BdrvDirtyBitmap *bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next(BlockDriverState 
*bs,
  char *bdrv_dirty_bitmap_sha256(const BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, Error **errp);
  int64_t bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_zero(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, uint64_t start,
                                      uint64_t bytes);
+bool bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty_area(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
+                                       uint64_t *offset, uint64_t end,
+                                       uint64_t *length);
  BdrvDirtyBitmap *bdrv_reclaim_dirty_bitmap_locked(BlockDriverState *bs,
                                                    BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
                                                    Error **errp);
diff --git a/include/qemu/hbitmap.h b/include/qemu/hbitmap.h
index 259bfc2936..347a46ef48 100644
--- a/include/qemu/hbitmap.h
+++ b/include/qemu/hbitmap.h
@@ -303,6 +303,21 @@ unsigned long hbitmap_iter_skip_words(HBitmapIter *hbi);
   */
  int64_t hbitmap_next_zero(const HBitmap *hb, uint64_t start, uint64_t bytes);
+/* hbitmap_next_dirty_area:
+ * @hb: The HBitmap to operate on
+ * @offset: in-out parameter.
+ *          in: the offset to start from
+ *          out: (if area found) start of found area
+ * @end: end of requested region. (address@hidden + address@hidden) will be <= 
@end
+ * @length: length of found area
+ *
+ * If dirty area found within address@hidden, @end), returns true and sets 
@offset
+ * and @length appropriately. Otherwise returns true and leaves @offset and
+ * @length unchanged.
+ */
+bool hbitmap_next_dirty_area(const HBitmap *hb, uint64_t *offset,
+                             uint64_t end, uint64_t *length);
+
  /* hbitmap_create_meta:
   * Create a "meta" hbitmap to track dirtiness of the bits in this HBitmap.
   * The caller owns the created bitmap and must call hbitmap_free_meta(hb) to
diff --git a/block/dirty-bitmap.c b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
index a9ee814da7..c24aa0e229 100644
--- a/block/dirty-bitmap.c
+++ b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
@@ -791,6 +791,13 @@ int64_t bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_zero(BdrvDirtyBitmap 
*bitmap, uint64_t offset,
      return hbitmap_next_zero(bitmap->bitmap, offset, bytes);
  }
+bool bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty_area(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
+                                       uint64_t *offset, uint64_t end,
+                                       uint64_t *length)
+{
+    return hbitmap_next_dirty_area(bitmap->bitmap, offset, end, length);
+}
+
  void bdrv_merge_dirty_bitmap(BdrvDirtyBitmap *dest, const BdrvDirtyBitmap 
*src,
                               Error **errp)
  {
diff --git a/util/hbitmap.c b/util/hbitmap.c
index 73137c10a0..7bfcb878c1 100644
--- a/util/hbitmap.c
+++ b/util/hbitmap.c
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@
   */
struct HBitmap {
+    /* Size of the bitmap, as requested in hbitmap_alloc. */
+    uint64_t orig_size;
+
      /* Number of total bits in the bottom level.  */
      uint64_t size;
@@ -238,6 +241,40 @@ int64_t hbitmap_next_zero(const HBitmap *hb, uint64_t start, uint64_t bytes)
      return res;
  }
+bool hbitmap_next_dirty_area(const HBitmap *hb, uint64_t *offset,
+                             uint64_t end, uint64_t *length)
+{
+    HBitmapIter hbi;
+    int64_t off1, off0;
+    uint32_t granularity = 1UL << hb->granularity;
+
+    if (end == 0) {
+        end = hb->orig_size;
+    }
+
+    hbitmap_iter_init(&hbi, hb, *offset << hb->granularity);
+    off1 = hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi, true);
+
+    if (off1 < 0 || off1 >= end) {
+        return false;
+    }
+
+    if (off1 + granularity >= end) {

here:
if (off1 > *offset) {

+        *offset = off1;

}

+        *length = end - off1;
instead:

*length = end - *offset;



+        return true;
+    }
+
+    off0 = hbitmap_next_zero(hb, off1 + granularity, end);
+    if (off0 < 0) {
+        off0 = end;
+    }
+

and here too:
if (off1 > *offset) {
+    *offset = off1;
}
+    *length = off0 - off1;
instead:

*length = off0 - *offset;


+    return true;
+}
+
  bool hbitmap_empty(const HBitmap *hb)
  {
      return hb->count == 0;
@@ -659,6 +696,8 @@ HBitmap *hbitmap_alloc(uint64_t size, int granularity)
      HBitmap *hb = g_new0(struct HBitmap, 1);
      unsigned i;
+ hb->orig_size = size;
+
      assert(granularity >= 0 && granularity < 64);
      size = (size + (1ULL << granularity) - 1) >> granularity;
      assert(size <= ((uint64_t)1 << HBITMAP_LOG_MAX_SIZE));


--
Best regards,
Vladimir




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]