qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 1/6] qemu-nbd: add support for authorization of


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 1/6] qemu-nbd: add support for authorization of TLS clients
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 15:06:06 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0

On 06/15/2018 10:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <address@hidden>

Currently any client which can complete the TLS handshake is able to use
the NBD server. The server admin can turn on the 'verify-peer' option
for the x509 creds to require the client to provide a x509 certificate.
This means the client will have to acquire a certificate from the CA
before they are permitted to use the NBD server. This is still a fairly
low bar to cross.

This adds a '--tls-authz OBJECT-ID' option to the qemu-nbd command which
takes the ID of a previously added 'QAuthZ' object instance. This will
be used to validate the client's x509 distinguished name. Clients
failing the authorization check will not be permitted to use the NBD
server.

For example to setup authorization that only allows connection from a client
whose x509 certificate distinguished name contains 'CN=fred', you would
use:

   qemu-nbd -object tls-creds-x509,id=tls0,dir=/home/berrange/qemutls,\
                    endpoint=server,verify-peer=yes \
            -object authz-simple,id=authz0,policy=deny,\
                   rules.0.match=*CN=fred,rules.0.policy=allow \

s/-object/--object/g

            -tls-creds tls0 \
            -tls-authz authz0

s/-tls/--tls/g

(qemu-nbd requires double-dash long-opts, -o means --offset except that 'bject' is not an offset; similarly for -t meaning --persistent)

           ....other qemu-nbd args...

Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <address@hidden>
---
  include/block/nbd.h |  2 +-
  nbd/server.c        | 12 +++++++-----
  qemu-nbd.c          | 13 ++++++++++++-
  qemu-nbd.texi       |  4 ++++
  4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

+++ b/nbd/server.c

@@ -2153,7 +2153,9 @@ void nbd_client_new(NBDExport *exp,
      if (tlscreds) {
          object_ref(OBJECT(client->tlscreds));
      }
-    client->tlsaclname = g_strdup(tlsaclname);
+    if (tlsauthz) {
+        client->tlsauthz = g_strdup(tlsauthz);
+    }

The 'if' is pointless; g_strdup(NULL) is safe.


+++ b/qemu-nbd.c

@@ -533,6 +535,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
          { "image-opts", no_argument, NULL, QEMU_NBD_OPT_IMAGE_OPTS },
          { "trace", required_argument, NULL, 'T' },
          { "fork", no_argument, NULL, QEMU_NBD_OPT_FORK },
+        { "tls-authz", no_argument, NULL, QEMU_NBD_OPT_TLSAUTHZ },

Not your fault, but worth sorting these alphabetically?

Bummer that pre-patch, you could use '--tls' as an unambiguous abbreviation for --tls-creds; now it is an ambiguous prefix (you have to type --tls-c or --tls-a to get to the point of no ambiguity). If we really cared, we could add:

{ "t", required_argument, NULL, QEMU_NBD_OPT_TLSCREDS },
{ "tl", required_argument, NULL, QEMU_NBD_OPT_TLSCREDS },
{ "tls", required_argument, NULL, QEMU_NBD_OPT_TLSCREDS },
{ "tls-", required_argument, NULL, QEMU_NBD_OPT_TLSCREDS },

since getopt_long() no longer reports ambiguity if there is an exact match to what is otherwise the common prefix of two ambiguous options. But I don't think backwards-compatibility on this front is worth worrying about (generally, scripts don't rely on getopt_long()'s unambiguous prefix handling).

+++ b/qemu-nbd.texi
@@ -91,6 +91,10 @@ of the TLS credentials object previously created with the 
--object
  option.
  @item --fork
  Fork off the server process and exit the parent once the server is running.
address@hidden --tls-authz=ID
+Specify the ID of a qauthz object previously created with the

s/qauthz/authz-simple/ ?

+--object option. This will be used to authorize users who
+connect against their x509 distinguished name.

Sounds like someone is "connecting against their name", rather than "authorizing against their name". Better might be:

This will be used to authorize connecting users against their x509 distinguished name.

--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]