qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1/2] block/file-posix: implement bdrv


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1/2] block/file-posix: implement bdrv_co_invalidate_cache() on Linux
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 08:13:58 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)

Am 20.04.2018 um 05:15 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:13:44PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Thu, 04/19 15:52, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Linux posix_fadvise(POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED) invalidates pages*.  Use
> > > this to drop page cache on the destination host during shared storage
> > > migration.  This way the destination host will read the latest copy of
> > > the data and will not use stale data from the page cache.
> > > 
> > > The flow is as follows:
> > > 
> > > 1. Source host writes out all dirty pages and inactivates drives.
> > > 2. QEMU_VM_EOF is sent on migration stream.
> > > 3. Destination host invalidates caches before accessing drives.
> > > 
> > > This patch enables live migration even with -drive cache.direct=off.
> > > 
> > > * Terms and conditions may apply, please see patch for details.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > >  block/file-posix.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c
> > > index 3794c0007a..df4f52919f 100644
> > > --- a/block/file-posix.c
> > > +++ b/block/file-posix.c
> > > @@ -2236,6 +2236,42 @@ static int coroutine_fn 
> > > raw_co_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
> > >      return ret | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static void coroutine_fn raw_co_invalidate_cache(BlockDriverState *bs,
> > > +                                                 Error **errp)
> > > +{
> > > +    BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque;
> > > +    int ret;
> > > +
> > > +    ret = fd_open(bs);
> > > +    if (ret < 0) {
> > > +        error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "The file descriptor is not open");
> > > +        return;
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > > +    if (s->open_flags & O_DIRECT) {
> > > +        return; /* No host kernel page cache */
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > > +#if defined(__linux__)
> > > +    /* This sets the scene for the next syscall... */
> > > +    ret = bdrv_co_flush(bs);
> > > +    if (ret < 0) {
> > > +        error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "flush failed");
> > > +        return;
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > > +    /* Linux does not invalidate pages that are dirty, locked, or 
> > > mmapped by a
> > > +     * process.  These limitations are okay because we just fsynced the 
> > > file,
> > > +     * we don't use mmap, and the file should not be in use by other 
> > > processes.
> > > +     */
> > > +    ret = posix_fadvise(s->fd, 0, 0, POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED);
> > > +    if (ret != 0) { /* the return value is a positive errno */
> > > +        error_setg_errno(errp, ret, "fadvise failed");
> > > +        return;
> > > +    }
> > > +#endif /* __linux__ */
> > 
> > What about the #else branch? It doesn't automatically work, I guess?
> 
> Right, no error is reported.  This is existing QEMU behavior.
> 
> If we want to change behavior then it must be done consistently (i.e. by
> auditing the other block drivers) and we need to be prepared for bug
> reports (just like file locking, it may expose interesting use cases
> that we cannot easily dismiss as wrong).  I didn't want to go there.
> 
> If there is consensus then I will change the behavior.

I think either way that would be for a separate patch.

I'm also not sure how useful that change would actually be because it
might give you a false sense of safety: Even with this patch, you still
need to be exactly aware of the conditions that make live migration with
shared storage work correctly. If we error out on some unsafe cases,
but not on others, this might be confusing.

On the other hand, the problematic image format drivers have been
setting migration blockers for a long time, so you could also argue that
file-posix is inconsistent with them because it completely ignores
unsafe scenarios.

Kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]