qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: Clean up some bad code in t


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: Clean up some bad code in the vvfat driver
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 21:08:20 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0

On 19.09.2017 21:01, John Snow wrote:
> 
> 
> On 09/19/2017 04:06 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 13/09/2017 21:08, John Snow wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/13/2017 06:21 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>> Remove the unnecessary home-grown redefinition of the assert() macro here,
>>>> and remove the unusable debug code at the end of the checkpoint() function.
>>>> The code there uses assert() with side-effects (assignment to the "mapping"
>>>> variable), which should be avoided. Looking more closely, it seems as it is
>>>> apparently also only usable for one certain directory layout (with a file
>>>> named USB.H in it) and thus is of no use for the rest of the world.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> Farewell, bitrot code.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: John Snow <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> Out of curiosity, I wonder ...
>>>
>>> address@hidden (foobar) ~/s/qemu> git grep '#if 0' | wc -l
>>> 320
>>
>>
>> $ git grep -c '#if 0' | sort -k2 --field-separator=: -n
>> ...
>> hw/net/eepro100.c:21
>> target/ppc/cpu-models.h:76
>>
>> whoa :)
>>
> 
> Wonder if '#if 0' should be against the style guide / in checkpatch.

checkpatch already complains if you have a "#if 0" in your patch, so I
think we should be pretty fine here already - but of course you can
still add a paragraph to the CODING_STYLE if you like.

 Thomas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]