qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v4] migration/block: move bdrv_is_allocated() in


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v4] migration/block: move bdrv_is_allocated() into bb's AioContext
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 16:54:01 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)

On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 04:03:49PM +0800, address@hidden wrote:
> From: Lidong Chen <address@hidden>
> 
> when block migration with high-speed, mig_save_device_bulk hold the
> BQL and invoke bdrv_is_allocated frequently. This patch moves
> bdrv_is_allocated() into bb's AioContext. It will execute without
> blocking other I/O activity.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lidong Chen <address@hidden>
> ---
>      v4 changelog:
>           Use the prototype code written by Stefan and fix some bug.
>           moves bdrv_is_allocated() into bb's AioContext.
> ---
>  migration/block.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Added Paolo because he's been reworking AioContext and locking.

The goal of this patch is to avoid waiting for bdrv_is_allocated() to
complete while holding locks.  Do bdrv_is_allocated() in the AioContext
so event processing continues after yield.

> 
> diff --git a/migration/block.c b/migration/block.c
> index 060087f..c871361 100644
> --- a/migration/block.c
> +++ b/migration/block.c
> @@ -263,6 +263,30 @@ static void blk_mig_read_cb(void *opaque, int ret)
>      blk_mig_unlock();
>  }
>  
> +typedef struct {
> +    int64_t *total_sectors;
> +    int64_t *cur_sector;
> +    BlockBackend *bb;
> +    QemuEvent event;
> +} MigNextAllocatedClusterData;
> +
> +static void coroutine_fn mig_next_allocated_cluster(void *opaque)
> +{
> +    MigNextAllocatedClusterData *data = opaque;
> +    int nr_sectors;
> +
> +    /* Skip unallocated sectors; intentionally treats failure as
> +     * an allocated sector */
> +    while (*data->cur_sector < *data->total_sectors &&
> +           !bdrv_is_allocated(blk_bs(data->bb), *data->cur_sector,
> +                              MAX_IS_ALLOCATED_SEARCH, &nr_sectors)) {
> +        *data->cur_sector += nr_sectors;
> +    }
> +
> +    bdrv_dec_in_flight(blk_bs(data->bb));
> +    qemu_event_set(&data->event);
> +}
> +
>  /* Called with no lock taken.  */
>  
>  static int mig_save_device_bulk(QEMUFile *f, BlkMigDevState *bmds)
> @@ -274,17 +298,23 @@ static int mig_save_device_bulk(QEMUFile *f, 
> BlkMigDevState *bmds)
>      int nr_sectors;
>  
>      if (bmds->shared_base) {
> +        AioContext *bb_ctx;
> +        Coroutine *co;
> +        MigNextAllocatedClusterData data = {
> +            .cur_sector = &cur_sector,
> +            .total_sectors = &total_sectors,
> +            .bb = bb,
> +        };
> +        qemu_event_init(&data.event, false);
> +
>          qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
> -        aio_context_acquire(blk_get_aio_context(bb));
> -        /* Skip unallocated sectors; intentionally treats failure as
> -         * an allocated sector */
> -        while (cur_sector < total_sectors &&
> -               !bdrv_is_allocated(blk_bs(bb), cur_sector,
> -                                  MAX_IS_ALLOCATED_SEARCH, &nr_sectors)) {
> -            cur_sector += nr_sectors;
> -        }
> -        aio_context_release(blk_get_aio_context(bb));
> +        bdrv_inc_in_flight(blk_bs(bb));

Please add a comment explaining why bdrv_inc_in_flight() is invoked.

> +        bb_ctx = blk_get_aio_context(bb);
> +        co = qemu_coroutine_create(mig_next_allocated_cluster, &data);
> +        aio_co_schedule(bb_ctx, co);
>          qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
> +
> +        qemu_event_wait(&data.event);
>      }
>  
>      if (cur_sector >= total_sectors) {
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]