qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] block/curl: Fix return value f


From: Matthew Booth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] block/curl: Fix return value from curl_read_cb
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 09:58:27 +0000

I've long since lost all context on this patch, so I'll trust you :)

Thanks for the ping,

Matt

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Kevin Wolf <address@hidden> wrote:
Am 25.10.2016 um 20:37 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 10/24/2016 09:54 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> > While commit 38bbc0a580f9f10570b1d1b5d3e92f0e6feb2970 is correct in that
> > the callback is supposed to return the number of bytes handled; what it
> > does not mention is that libcurl will throw an error if the callback did
> > not "handle" all of the data passed to it.
> >
> > Therefore, if the callback receives some data that it cannot handle
> > (either because the receive buffer has not been set up yet or because it
> > would not fit into the receive buffer) and we have to ignore it, we
> > still have to report that the data has been handled.
> >
> > Obviously, this should not happen normally. But it does happen at least
> > for FTP connections where some data (that we do not expect) may be
> > generated when the connection is established.
>
> Just to make sure, we aren't losing data by reporting this value, but
> merely letting curl know that our callback has "dealt" with the data, so
> that we don't error out, in order to get a second chance at the same
> data later on?
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
>
> But given that it undoes 38bbc0a, I'd rather that it gets reviewed by
> Matthew and/or tested by Richard.

In that case, I guess we should CC them. (Hereby done.)

Kevin



--
Matthew Booth
Red Hat Engineering, Virtualisation Team

Phone: +442070094448 (UK)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]