qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] qapi: Allow blockdev-add for N


From: Daniel P. Berrange
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] qapi: Allow blockdev-add for NBD
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:19:32 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 02:08:23PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 03.02.2016 um 18:06 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> > On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 05:33:16PM +0100, Max Reitz wrote:
> > > We have to introduce a new object (BlockdevOptionsNbd) for several
> > > reasons:
> > > - Neither of InetSocketAddress nor UnixSocketAddress alone is
> > >   sufficient, because both are supported
> > > - We cannot use SocketAddress because NBD does not support an fd,
> > >   and because it is not a flat union which BlockdevOptionsNbd is
> > 
> > With my patch series that converts NBD to use QIOChannel, all the
> > entry points for client & server *do* take a SocketAddress struct
> > to provide address info. So internally the code does in fact allow
> > use of an FD, if there were a way to specify it a the QAPI level...
> > 
> > eg see
> > 
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-01/msg04159.html
> 
> That's patch 1 of a series that has a few more dependencies. Can the
> patch be applied without the rest of the series (and without the
> dependencies) so that we don't have to wait for a very long time with
> Max's patches?

Paolo ackd the main nbd series, so we're just waiting for the CLI
patch series it depends on

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-02/msg00296.html

In terms of merging the NBD series, the bare minimum is the qom patch
and the --object arg support. I could rebase the NBD series to just
include those two directly, since they're basically ready:

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-02/msg00297.html
  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-02/msg00302.html

Eric ACK'd the second one, and the fixes for the first one were
trivial.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]