qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/2] hw/acpi: bump MADT to revision 5


From: Ani Sinha
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] hw/acpi: bump MADT to revision 5
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 13:06:36 +0530 (IST)


On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 08:14:37AM -0500, Eric DeVolder wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 3/29/23 00:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Hmm I don't think we can reasonably make such a change for 8.0.
> > > Seems too risky.
> > > Also, I feel we want to have an internal (with "x-" prefix") flag to
> > > revert to old behaviour, in case of breakage on some guests.  and maybe
> > > we want to keep old revision for old machine types.
> > Ok, what option name, for keeping old behavior, would you like?
>
> Don't much care. x-madt-rev?
>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:59:24AM -0400, Eric DeVolder wrote:
> > > > The following Linux kernel change broke CPU hotplug for MADT revision
> > > > less than 5.
> > > >
> > > >   commit e2869bd7af60 ("x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that 
> > > > cannot be onlined for x2APIC")
> > >
> > > Presumably it's being fixed? Link to discussion? Patch fixing that in
> > > Linux?
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20230327191026.3454-1-eric.devolder@oracle.com/T/#t
>
> Great! Maybe stick a Link: tag in the commit log.

If the original bug is in the kernel and kernel upstream has accepted both
your fix and Mario's patch on the acpi revision mess, I see no urgency to
fix this in QEMU.

Maybe we can address this in the 8.1 development window.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]