qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 23/51] target/arm: Implement SME RDSVL, ADDSVL, ADDSPL


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 23/51] target/arm: Implement SME RDSVL, ADDSVL, ADDSPL
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 18:23:01 +0100

On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 at 19:13, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> These SME instructions are nominally within the SVE decode space,
> so we add them to sve.decode and translate-sve.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
>  target/arm/translate-a64.h |  1 +
>  target/arm/sve.decode      |  5 ++++-
>  target/arm/translate-a64.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  target/arm/translate-sve.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

> diff --git a/target/arm/translate-sve.c b/target/arm/translate-sve.c
> index 62b5f3040c..13bdd027a5 100644
> --- a/target/arm/translate-sve.c
> +++ b/target/arm/translate-sve.c
> @@ -1286,6 +1286,19 @@ static bool trans_ADDVL(DisasContext *s, arg_ADDVL *a)
>      return true;
>  }
>
> +static bool trans_ADDSVL(DisasContext *s, arg_ADDSVL *a)
> +{
> +    if (!dc_isar_feature(aa64_sme, s)) {
> +        return false;
> +    }
> +    if (sme_enabled_check(s)) {
> +        TCGv_i64 rd = cpu_reg_sp(s, a->rd);
> +        TCGv_i64 rn = cpu_reg_sp(s, a->rn);
> +        tcg_gen_addi_i64(rd, rn, a->imm * s->svl);
> +    }
> +    return true;
> +}
> +
>  static bool trans_ADDPL(DisasContext *s, arg_ADDPL *a)
>  {
>      if (!dc_isar_feature(aa64_sve, s)) {
> @@ -1299,6 +1312,19 @@ static bool trans_ADDPL(DisasContext *s, arg_ADDPL *a)
>      return true;
>  }
>
> +static bool trans_ADDSPL(DisasContext *s, arg_ADDSPL *a)
> +{
> +    if (!dc_isar_feature(aa64_sme, s)) {
> +        return false;
> +    }
> +    if (sme_enabled_check(s)) {
> +        TCGv_i64 rd = cpu_reg_sp(s, a->rd);
> +        TCGv_i64 rn = cpu_reg_sp(s, a->rn);
> +        tcg_gen_addi_i64(rd, rn, a->imm * (s->svl / 8));
> +    }
> +    return true;
> +}
> +
>  static bool trans_RDVL(DisasContext *s, arg_RDVL *a)
>  {
>      if (!dc_isar_feature(aa64_sve, s)) {
> @@ -1311,6 +1337,18 @@ static bool trans_RDVL(DisasContext *s, arg_RDVL *a)
>      return true;
>  }
>
> +static bool trans_RDSVL(DisasContext *s, arg_RDSVL *a)
> +{
> +    if (!dc_isar_feature(aa64_sme, s)) {
> +        return false;
> +    }
> +    if (sme_enabled_check(s)) {
> +        TCGv_i64 reg = cpu_reg(s, a->rd);
> +        tcg_gen_movi_i64(reg, a->imm * s->svl);
> +    }
> +    return true;
> +}

I think we should define functions that parallel the SVE
vec_full_reg_size() and pred_full_reg_size() rather than directly
looking at s->svl, for consistency with how we did the SVE code.

Otherwise
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]