qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] intel_iommu: Fix mask may be uninitialized in vtd_con


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] intel_iommu: Fix mask may be uninitialized in vtd_context_device_invalidate
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 11:08:49 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0

On 2/25/21 10:14 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
> With -Werror=maybe-uninitialized configuration we get
> ../hw/i386/intel_iommu.c: In function ‘vtd_context_device_invalidate’:
> ../hw/i386/intel_iommu.c:1888:10: error: ‘mask’ may be used
> uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>  1888 |     mask = ~mask;
>       |     ~~~~~^~~~~~~
> 
> Add a g_assert_not_reached() to avoid the error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> index b4f5094259..3206f379f8 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> @@ -1884,6 +1884,8 @@ static void 
> vtd_context_device_invalidate(IntelIOMMUState *s,
>      case 3:
>          mask = 7;   /* Mask bit 2:0 in the SID field */
>          break;
> +    default:
> +        g_assert_not_reached();
>      }
>      mask = ~mask;

Unrelated to this patch, but I wonder why we don't directly assign the
correct value of the mask in the switch cases...

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>

set the mask
diuse the
>  
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]