qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] sparc/sun4m: Use start-powered-off CPUState property


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] sparc/sun4m: Use start-powered-off CPUState property
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:54:58 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0

On 8/26/20 7:55 AM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Instead of setting CPUState::halted to 1 in secondary_cpu_reset(), use the
> start-powered-off property which makes cpu_common_reset() initialize it
> to 1 in common code.
> 
> Now secondary_cpu_reset() becomes equivalent to main_cpu_reset() so rename
> the function to sun4m_cpu_reset().
> 
> Also remove setting of cs->halted from cpu_devinit(), which seems out of
> place when compared to similar code in other architectures (e.g.,
> ppce500_init() in hw/ppc/e500.c).
> 
> Finally, change creation of CPU object from cpu_create() to object_new()
> and qdev_realize_and_unref() because cpu_create() realizes the CPU and it's
> not possible to set a property after the object is realized.
> 
> Suggested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  hw/sparc/sun4m.c | 25 ++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/sparc/sun4m.c b/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
> index 7484aa4438..6bf9d27d8a 100644
> --- a/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
> +++ b/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static void dummy_cpu_set_irq(void *opaque, int irq, int 
> level)
>  {
>  }
>  
> -static void main_cpu_reset(void *opaque)
> +static void sun4m_cpu_reset(void *opaque)
>  {
>      SPARCCPU *cpu = opaque;
>      CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
> @@ -226,15 +226,6 @@ static void main_cpu_reset(void *opaque)
>      cpu_reset(cs);
>  }
>  
> -static void secondary_cpu_reset(void *opaque)
> -{
> -    SPARCCPU *cpu = opaque;
> -    CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
> -
> -    cpu_reset(cs);
> -    cs->halted = 1;
> -}
> -
>  static void cpu_halt_signal(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
>  {
>      if (level && current_cpu) {
> @@ -818,21 +809,17 @@ static const TypeInfo ram_info = {
>  static void cpu_devinit(const char *cpu_type, unsigned int id,
>                          uint64_t prom_addr, qemu_irq **cpu_irqs)
>  {
> -    CPUState *cs;
>      SPARCCPU *cpu;
>      CPUSPARCState *env;
>  
> -    cpu = SPARC_CPU(cpu_create(cpu_type));
> +    cpu = SPARC_CPU(object_new(cpu_type));
>      env = &cpu->env;
>  
>      cpu_sparc_set_id(env, id);
> -    if (id == 0) {
> -        qemu_register_reset(main_cpu_reset, cpu);
> -    } else {
> -        qemu_register_reset(secondary_cpu_reset, cpu);
> -        cs = CPU(cpu);
> -        cs->halted = 1;
> -    }
> +    qemu_register_reset(sun4m_cpu_reset, cpu);
> +    object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(cpu), "start-powered-off", id != 0,
> +                             &error_fatal);
> +    qdev_realize_and_unref(DEVICE(cpu), NULL, &error_fatal);

It is cleaner to call qemu_register_reset() after realize().

Anyway,
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>

>      *cpu_irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(cpu_set_irq, cpu, MAX_PILS);
>      env->prom_addr = prom_addr;
>  }
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]