qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2] target/arm/cpu: adjust virtual time for arm cpu


From: Ying Fang
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] target/arm/cpu: adjust virtual time for arm cpu
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 15:16:21 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0



On 6/3/2020 4:26 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 10:02:08AM +0800, Ying Fang wrote:
Virtual time adjustment was implemented for virt-5.0 machine type,
but the cpu property was enabled only for host-passthrough and
max cpu model. Let's add it for arm cpu which has the gernic
timer feature enabled.


Signed-off-by: Ying Fang <fangying1@huawei.com>

---
v2:
- move kvm_arm_add_vcpu_properties into arm_cpu_post_init

v1:
- initial commit
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-05/msg08518.html

---
  target/arm/cpu.c   | 3 +--
  target/arm/cpu64.c | 1 -
  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
index 32bec156f2..1e9b7a51f2 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
@@ -1244,6 +1244,7 @@ void arm_cpu_post_init(Object *obj)
if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_GENERIC_TIMER)) {
          qdev_property_add_static(DEVICE(cpu), &arm_cpu_gt_cntfrq_property);
+        kvm_arm_add_vcpu_properties(obj);

The name 'kvm_arm_add_vcpu_properties' says nothing about being specific
to the timer. So this is either the wrong place for this function, or the
function is named wrong. I'd say it's the wrong place, because, as the
comment above kvm_arm_add_vcpu_properties() implies, the function is
for all 'kvm-*' prefixed properties, not just timer related ones. It's
true we don't have any others yet, but we will. I have plans to post
can't agree more.

kvm-steal-time soon, and despite it also having 'time' in its name, it
shouldn't depend on ARM_FEATURE_GENERIC_TIMER.
yes, that would be nice.


How about the below [untested] patch instead?
this patch is much more reasonable for me, thanks for your help.
I've tested it and it works fine.


Thanks,
drew

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
index 32bec156f2d4..e9084f98ef10 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
@@ -1245,6 +1245,10 @@ void arm_cpu_post_init(Object *obj)
      if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_GENERIC_TIMER)) {
          qdev_property_add_static(DEVICE(cpu), &arm_cpu_gt_cntfrq_property);
      }
+
+    if (kvm_enabled()) {
+        kvm_arm_add_vcpu_properties()

should be kvm_arm_add_vcpu_properties(obj);

+    }
  }
static void arm_cpu_finalizefn(Object *obj)
@@ -2029,7 +2033,6 @@ static void arm_max_initfn(Object *obj)
if (kvm_enabled()) {
          kvm_arm_set_cpu_features_from_host(cpu);
-        kvm_arm_add_vcpu_properties(obj);
      } else {
          cortex_a15_initfn(obj);
@@ -2183,7 +2186,6 @@ static void arm_host_initfn(Object *obj)
      if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64)) {
          aarch64_add_sve_properties(obj);
      }
-    kvm_arm_add_vcpu_properties(obj);
      arm_cpu_post_init(obj);
  }
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c
index cbc5c3868fce..778cecc2e6ca 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu64.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c
@@ -592,7 +592,6 @@ static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj)
if (kvm_enabled()) {
          kvm_arm_set_cpu_features_from_host(cpu);
-        kvm_arm_add_vcpu_properties(obj);
      } else {
          uint64_t t;
          uint32_t u;
diff --git a/target/arm/kvm.c b/target/arm/kvm.c
index 4bdbe6dcac07..eef3bbd1cc2c 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm.c
+++ b/target/arm/kvm.c
@@ -194,17 +194,18 @@ static void kvm_no_adjvtime_set(Object *obj, bool value, 
Error **errp)
  /* KVM VCPU properties should be prefixed with "kvm-". */
  void kvm_arm_add_vcpu_properties(Object *obj)
  {
-    if (!kvm_enabled()) {
-        return;
-    }
+    ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
+    CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
- ARM_CPU(obj)->kvm_adjvtime = true;
-    object_property_add_bool(obj, "kvm-no-adjvtime", kvm_no_adjvtime_get,
-                             kvm_no_adjvtime_set);
-    object_property_set_description(obj, "kvm-no-adjvtime",
-                                    "Set on to disable the adjustment of "
-                                    "the virtual counter. VM stopped time "
-                                    "will be counted.");
+    if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_GENERIC_TIMER)) {
+        cpu->kvm_adjvtime = true;
+        object_property_add_bool(obj, "kvm-no-adjvtime", kvm_no_adjvtime_get,
+                                 kvm_no_adjvtime_set);
+        object_property_set_description(obj, "kvm-no-adjvtime",
+                                        "Set on to disable the adjustment of "
+                                        "the virtual counter. VM stopped time "
+                                        "will be counted.");
+    }
  }
bool kvm_arm_pmu_supported(CPUState *cpu)


      }
  }
@@ -2029,7 +2030,6 @@ static void arm_max_initfn(Object *obj) if (kvm_enabled()) {
          kvm_arm_set_cpu_features_from_host(cpu);
-        kvm_arm_add_vcpu_properties(obj);
      } else {
          cortex_a15_initfn(obj);
@@ -2183,7 +2183,6 @@ static void arm_host_initfn(Object *obj)
      if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64)) {
          aarch64_add_sve_properties(obj);
      }
-    kvm_arm_add_vcpu_properties(obj);
      arm_cpu_post_init(obj);
  }
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c
index cbc5c3868f..778cecc2e6 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu64.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c
@@ -592,7 +592,6 @@ static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj)
if (kvm_enabled()) {
          kvm_arm_set_cpu_features_from_host(cpu);
-        kvm_arm_add_vcpu_properties(obj);
      } else {
          uint64_t t;
          uint32_t u;
--
2.23.0





.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]