qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v25 00/10] Add ARMv8 RAS virtualization support in QEMU


From: gengdongjiu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v25 00/10] Add ARMv8 RAS virtualization support in QEMU
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 21:46:28 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0


On 2020/5/7 4:25, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 07:42:19PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote:
>> On 2020/4/17 21:32, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 12:46, Dongjiu Geng <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In the ARMv8 platform, the CPU error types includes synchronous external 
>>>> abort(SEA)
>>>> and SError Interrupt (SEI). If exception happens in guest, host does not 
>>>> know the detailed
>>>> information of guest, so it is expected that guest can do the recovery. 
>>>> For example, if an
>>>> exception happens in a guest user-space application, host does not know 
>>>> which application
>>>> encounters errors, only guest knows it.
>>>>
>>>> For the ARMv8 SEA/SEI, KVM or host kernel delivers SIGBUS to notify 
>>>> userspace.
>>>> After user space gets the notification, it will record the CPER into guest 
>>>> GHES
>>>> buffer and inject an exception or IRQ to guest.
>>>>
>>>> In the current implementation, if the type of SIGBUS is BUS_MCEERR_AR, we 
>>>> will
>>>> treat it as a synchronous exception, and notify guest with ARMv8 SEA
>>>> notification type after recording CPER into guest.
>>>
>>> Hi. I left a comment on patch 1. The other 3 patches unreviewed
>>> are 5, 6 and 8, which are all ACPI core code, so that's for
>>> MST, Igor or Shannon to review.
>>>
>>> Once those have been reviewed, please ping me if you want this
>>> to go via target-arm.next.
>>
>> Hi Peter,
>>    Igor have reviewed all ACPI core code. whether you can apply this series 
>> to target-arm.next I can make another patches to solve your comments on 
>> patch1 and another APCI comment.
>> Thanks very much in advance.
> 
> Given it all starts with patch 1, it's probably easier to address the
> comment and repost.

  Done.

  Hi Peter,
      Please review the patch 1 in the patchset v26. Thanks.
> 
> 
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> -- PMM
>>>
>>> .
>>>
> 
> .
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]