[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] target/arm: kvm: Inject events at the last stage of s
From: |
Beata Michalska |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] target/arm: kvm: Inject events at the last stage of sync |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Feb 2020 21:41:10 +0000 |
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 10:34, Andrew Jones <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 08:24:40PM +0000, Beata Michalska wrote:
> > KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS might actually lead to vcpu registers being modified.
> > As such this should be the last step of sync to avoid potential overwriting
> > of whatever changes KVM might have done.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > target/arm/kvm32.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> > target/arm/kvm64.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/arm/kvm32.c b/target/arm/kvm32.c
> > index 32bf8d6..cf2b47f 100644
> > --- a/target/arm/kvm32.c
> > +++ b/target/arm/kvm32.c
> > @@ -386,17 +386,17 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > - ret = kvm_put_vcpu_events(cpu);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > -
> > write_cpustate_to_list(cpu, true);
> >
> > if (!write_list_to_kvmstate(cpu, level)) {
> > return EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > + ret = kvm_put_vcpu_events(cpu);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
>
> I think we should put a comment above this that says basically the same
> thing as the commit message in order to explain why kvm_put_vcpu_events()
> *must* be after write_list_to_kvmstate().
>
Will do that.
> > kvm_arm_sync_mpstate_to_kvm(cpu);
> >
> > return ret;
> > @@ -462,11 +462,6 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs)
> > }
> > vfp_set_fpscr(env, fpscr);
> >
> > - ret = kvm_get_vcpu_events(cpu);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > -
> > if (!write_kvmstate_to_list(cpu)) {
> > return EINVAL;
> > }
> > @@ -475,6 +470,11 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs)
> > */
> > write_list_to_cpustate(cpu);
> >
> > + ret = kvm_get_vcpu_events(cpu);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
>
> Why are we moving kvm_get_vcpu_events()?
This is only to make things consistent with put_registeres.
There is no functional change per se.
BR
Beata
> > kvm_arm_sync_mpstate_to_qemu(cpu);
> >
> > return 0;
> > diff --git a/target/arm/kvm64.c b/target/arm/kvm64.c
> > index 6344113..d06fd32 100644
> > --- a/target/arm/kvm64.c
> > +++ b/target/arm/kvm64.c
> > @@ -1043,17 +1043,17 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > - ret = kvm_put_vcpu_events(cpu);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > -
> > write_cpustate_to_list(cpu, true);
> >
> > if (!write_list_to_kvmstate(cpu, level)) {
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > + ret = kvm_put_vcpu_events(cpu);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > kvm_arm_sync_mpstate_to_kvm(cpu);
> >
> > return ret;
> > @@ -1251,11 +1251,6 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs)
> > }
> > vfp_set_fpcr(env, fpr);
> >
> > - ret = kvm_get_vcpu_events(cpu);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > -
> > if (!write_kvmstate_to_list(cpu)) {
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > @@ -1264,6 +1259,11 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs)
> > */
> > write_list_to_cpustate(cpu);
> >
> > + ret = kvm_get_vcpu_events(cpu);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > kvm_arm_sync_mpstate_to_qemu(cpu);
> >
> > /* TODO: other registers */
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> >
>
> Same comments for kvm64.c as for kvm32.c
>
> Thanks,
> drew
>