qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 00/19] hw/arm/raspi: Improve Raspberry Pi 2/3 reliability


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] hw/arm/raspi: Improve Raspberry Pi 2/3 reliability
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:45:59 +0100

On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 18:34, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I previously posted a RFC for the Raspberry Pi 4:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg642241.html
> and got it almost working (boots Linux kernel to userland, sadly
> I'm still having timeout issues with the eMMC block).
> However since it is quite usable, I started to clean up to post
> the series and realized it is way too big for Peter Maydell, so
> I'm following his rule of thumb by splitting in 3 sets of ~20
> functional patches.

> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (19):
>   hw/arm/raspi: Use the IEC binary prefix definitions
>   hw/arm/bcm2835_peripherals: Improve logging
>   hw/arm/bcm2835_peripherals: Name various address spaces
>   hw/arm/bcm2835: Rename some definitions
>   hw/arm/bcm2835: Add various unimplemented peripherals
>   hw/char/bcm2835_aux: Add trace events
>   hw/misc/bcm2835_mbox: Add trace events
>   hw/misc/bcm2835_thermal: Add a dummy BCM2835 thermal sensor
>   hw/arm/bcm2835_peripherals: Use the thermal sensor block
>   hw/timer/bcm2835: Add the BCM2835 SYS_timer
>   hw/arm/bcm2835_peripherals: Use the SYS_timer
>   hw/arm/bcm2835_peripherals: Add Clock/Power/Reset Manager blocks
>   hw/arm/raspi: Define various blocks base addresses
>   python/qemu/machine: Allow to use other serial consoles than default
>   tests/boot_linux_console: Extract the gunzip() helper
>   tests/boot_linux_console: Add a test for the Raspberry Pi 2
>   tests/boot_linux_console: Test the raspi2 UART1 (16550 based)
>   tests/boot_linux_console: Boot Linux and run few commands on raspi3
>   tests/boot_linux_console: Test SDHCI and termal sensor on raspi3

>From this patchset, I'm going to apply patches 1-5 and 7
to target-arm.next, since they're good cleanups that have
been reviewed. I've given a few review comments on
some of the others but mostly it seems to have been reviewed
by others already (so thanks to those reviewers).

-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]