[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 8/8] hw: acpi: Remove AcpiRsdpDesc
From: |
Samuel Ortiz |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 8/8] hw: acpi: Remove AcpiRsdpDescriptor and fix tests |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:35:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 04:07:43PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 02:24:28PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > The only remaining AcpiRsdpDescriptor users are the ACPI utils for the
> > BIOS table tests.
> > We remove that dependency and can thus remove the structure itself.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h | 13 -----------
> > tests/acpi-utils.h | 5 +++-
> > tests/acpi-utils.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > tests/bios-tables-test.c | 27 +++++++++++++++-------
> > tests/vmgenid-test.c | 8 ++++---
> > 5 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h b/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
> > index 8425ecb8c6..5021cb9e79 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
> > @@ -40,19 +40,6 @@ enum {
> > ACPI_FADT_F_LOW_POWER_S0_IDLE_CAPABLE,
> > };
> >
> > -struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor { /* Root System Descriptor Pointer */
> > - uint64_t signature; /* ACPI signature, contains "RSD PTR
> > " */
> > - uint8_t checksum; /* To make sum of struct == 0 */
> > - uint8_t oem_id [6]; /* OEM identification */
> > - uint8_t revision; /* Must be 0 for 1.0, 2 for 2.0 */
> > - uint32_t rsdt_physical_address; /* 32-bit physical address of RSDT */
> > - uint32_t length; /* XSDT Length in bytes including hdr
> > */
> > - uint64_t xsdt_physical_address; /* 64-bit physical address of XSDT */
> > - uint8_t extended_checksum; /* Checksum of entire table */
> > - uint8_t reserved [3]; /* Reserved field must be 0 */
> > -} QEMU_PACKED;
> > -typedef struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor AcpiRsdpDescriptor;
> > -
> > typedef struct AcpiRsdpData {
> > uint8_t oem_id[6]; /* OEM identification */
> > uint8_t revision; /* Must be 0 for 1.0, 2 for 2.0 */
> > diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.h b/tests/acpi-utils.h
> > index ac52abd0dd..c26c8976a6 100644
> > --- a/tests/acpi-utils.h
> > +++ b/tests/acpi-utils.h
> > @@ -82,6 +82,9 @@ typedef struct {
> >
> > uint8_t acpi_calc_checksum(const uint8_t *data, int len);
> > uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(void);
> > -void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(uint32_t addr, AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table);
> > +uint32_t acpi_get_rsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table);
> > +uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table);
> > +void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table,
> > + uint8_t revision);
> >
> > #endif /* TEST_ACPI_UTILS_H */
> > diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.c b/tests/acpi-utils.c
> > index 41dc1ea9b4..b1113bda8b 100644
> > --- a/tests/acpi-utils.c
> > +++ b/tests/acpi-utils.c
> > @@ -52,14 +52,44 @@ uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(void)
> > return off;
> > }
> >
> > -void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(uint32_t addr, AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table)
> > +uint32_t acpi_get_rsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table)
> > {
> > - ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->signature, addr);
> > - ACPI_ASSERT_CMP64(rsdp_table->signature, "RSD PTR ");
> > + uint32_t rsdt_physical_address;
> > + uint8_t revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */];
> >
> > - ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->checksum, addr);
> > - ACPI_READ_ARRAY(rsdp_table->oem_id, addr);
> > - ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->revision, addr);
> > - ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->rsdt_physical_address, addr);
> > - ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->length, addr);
> > + if (revision != 0) { /* ACPI 1.0 RSDP */
> > + return 0;
> > + }
>
> So now we assume a zero offset can't be valid, which means we don't need
> pointers in the struct. Your answer that pointers are used for consistency
> is good enough for me though.
>
> > +
> > + memcpy(&rsdt_physical_address, &rsdp_table[16 /* RsdtAddress offset
> > */], 4);
> > + return le32_to_cpu(rsdt_physical_address);
> > +}
> > +
> > +uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table)
> > +{
> > + uint64_t xsdt_physical_address;
> > + uint8_t revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */];
> > +
> > + if (revision != 2) { /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP */
>
> revision < 2
>
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + memcpy(&xsdt_physical_address, &rsdp_table[24 /* XsdtAddress offset
> > */], 8);
> > + return le64_to_cpu(xsdt_physical_address);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table, uint8_t
> > revision)
> > +{
> > + switch (revision) {
> > + case 0: /* ACPI 1.0 RSDP */
> > + memread(addr, rsdp_table, 20);
> > + break;
> > + case 2: /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP */
> > + memread(addr, rsdp_table, 36);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + g_assert_not_reached();
> > + }
> > +
> > + ACPI_ASSERT_CMP64(*((uint64_t *)(rsdp_table)), "RSD PTR ");
> > }
> > diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> > index d661d9be62..84f1500920 100644
> > --- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> > +++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> > @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ typedef struct {
> > const char *machine;
> > const char *variant;
> > uint32_t rsdp_addr;
> > - AcpiRsdpDescriptor rsdp_table;
> > + uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */];
> > + uint32_t rsdt_physical_address;
>
> I don't see rsdt_physical_address getting used anyway.
Good catch, thanks. Removed in v3.
Cheers,
Samuel.
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 6/8] hw: arm: Support both legacy and current RSDP build, Igor Mammedov, 2018/11/30
[Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 7/8] hw: acpi: Export and share the ARM RSDP build, Samuel Ortiz, 2018/11/29
[Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 8/8] hw: acpi: Remove AcpiRsdpDescriptor and fix tests, Samuel Ortiz, 2018/11/29
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/8] hw: acpi: RSDP fixes and refactoring, Igor Mammedov, 2018/11/30