qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] acpi: generalize aml_package / aml_varpackage


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] acpi: generalize aml_package / aml_varpackage
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 17:52:32 +0200

On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 02:53:09 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden> wrote:

> VarPackage can accept an expression evaluating to int, not just an int.
> Change the API to make it more generic.
> Further, rather than have users call the correct API depending on
> value passed, use either PackageOp or VarPackageOp automatically.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> ---
>  include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h |  4 ++--
>  hw/acpi/aml-build.c         | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>  hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.c       | 11 ++---------
>  hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c    |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> index 10c7946028..7cf2cf64bf 100644
> --- a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> @@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ Aml *aml_method(const char *name, int arg_count, 
> AmlSerializeFlag sflag);
>  Aml *aml_if(Aml *predicate);
>  Aml *aml_else(void);
>  Aml *aml_while(Aml *predicate);
> -Aml *aml_package(uint8_t num_elements);
> +Aml *aml_package(uint64_t num_elements);
>  Aml *aml_buffer(int buffer_size, uint8_t *byte_list);
>  Aml *aml_resource_template(void);
>  Aml *aml_field(const char *name, AmlAccessType type, AmlLockRule lock,
> @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ Aml *aml_create_field(Aml *srcbuf, Aml *bit_index, Aml 
> *num_bits,
>                        const char *name);
>  Aml *aml_create_dword_field(Aml *srcbuf, Aml *index, const char *name);
>  Aml *aml_create_qword_field(Aml *srcbuf, Aml *index, const char *name);
> -Aml *aml_varpackage(uint32_t num_elements);
> +Aml *aml_varpackage(Aml *num_elements);
maybe drop it from header and make static so only aml_package() would be
left as public API like in spec?


>  Aml *aml_touuid(const char *uuid);
>  Aml *aml_unicode(const char *str);
>  Aml *aml_refof(Aml *arg);
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> index def62b3112..1996768b40 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> @@ -1016,9 +1016,19 @@ Aml *aml_buffer(int buffer_size, uint8_t *byte_list)
>  }
>  
>  /* ACPI 1.0b: 16.2.5.4 Type 2 Opcodes Encoding: DefPackage */
> -Aml *aml_package(uint8_t num_elements)
> +/* Note: The ability to create variable-sized packages was first
> + * introduced in ACPI 2.0. ACPI 1.0 only allowed fixed-size packages
> + * with up to 255 elements. Windows guests up to win2k8 fail when
> + * VarPackageOp is used.
> + */
> +Aml *aml_package(uint64_t num_elements)
>  {
> -    Aml *var = aml_bundle(0x12 /* PackageOp */, AML_PACKAGE);
> +    Aml *var;
> +
> +    if (num_elements > 0xFF)
> +        return aml_varpackage(aml_int(num_elements));
> +
> +    var = aml_bundle(0x12 /* PackageOp */, AML_PACKAGE);
>      build_append_byte(var->buf, num_elements);
>      return var;
>  }
> @@ -1136,10 +1146,10 @@ Aml *aml_local(int num)
>  }
>  
>  /* ACPI 2.0a: 17.2.2 Data Objects Encoding: DefVarPackage */
> -Aml *aml_varpackage(uint32_t num_elements)
> +Aml *aml_varpackage(Aml *num_elements)
>  {
>      Aml *var = aml_bundle(0x13 /* VarPackageOp */, AML_PACKAGE);
> -    build_append_int(var->buf, num_elements);
> +    aml_append(var, num_elements);
>      return var;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.c b/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.c
> index 5243918125..f8246fca6f 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.c
> @@ -309,15 +309,8 @@ void build_legacy_cpu_hotplug_aml(Aml *ctx, MachineState 
> *machine,
>      }
>      aml_append(sb_scope, method);
>  
> -    /* build "Name(CPON, Package() { One, One, ..., Zero, Zero, ... })"
> -     *
> -     * Note: The ability to create variable-sized packages was first
> -     * introduced in ACPI 2.0. ACPI 1.0 only allowed fixed-size packages
> -     * ith up to 255 elements. Windows guests up to win2k8 fail when
> -     * VarPackageOp is used.
> -     */
> -    pkg = pcms->apic_id_limit <= 255 ? aml_package(pcms->apic_id_limit) :
> -                                       aml_varpackage(pcms->apic_id_limit);
> +    /* build "Name(CPON, Package() { One, One, ..., Zero, Zero, ... })" */
> +    pkg = aml_package(pcms->apic_id_limit);
>  
>      for (i = 0, apic_idx = 0; i < apic_ids->len; i++) {
>          int apic_id = apic_ids->cpus[i].arch_id;
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> index 6ea47e2588..2adb1de378 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_pci(Aml *scope, const 
> MemMapEntry *memmap,
>      aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_CCA", aml_int(1)));
>  
>      /* Declare the PCI Routing Table. */
> -    Aml *rt_pkg = aml_varpackage(nr_pcie_buses * PCI_NUM_PINS);
> +    Aml *rt_pkg = aml_package(nr_pcie_buses * PCI_NUM_PINS);
>      for (bus_no = 0; bus_no < nr_pcie_buses; bus_no++) {
>          for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_PINS; i++) {
>              int gsi = (i + bus_no) % PCI_NUM_PINS;




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]