qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] disas/libvixl: Fix VIXL_FALLTHROUGH macro for QEM


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] disas/libvixl: Fix VIXL_FALLTHROUGH macro for QEMU
Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 15:44:21 +0100

On 13 May 2018 at 10:57, Stefan Weil <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am 13.05.2018 um 11:06 schrieb Stefan Weil:
>> It now prevents compiler warnings (enabled with -Wimplicit-fallthrough=
>> or -Wextra) as intended.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>
>> I suggest to add and use a similar macro QEMU_FALLTHROUGH()
>> for the rest of the code and can provide a patch if that's
>> fine for everyone.
>>
>> Regards
>> Stefan
>>
>>  disas/libvixl/vixl/globals.h | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/disas/libvixl/vixl/globals.h b/disas/libvixl/vixl/globals.h
>> index 61dc9f7f7e..33c4231d91 100644
>> --- a/disas/libvixl/vixl/globals.h
>> +++ b/disas/libvixl/vixl/globals.h
>> @@ -112,6 +112,8 @@ inline void USE(T1, T2, T3, T4) {}
>>  // C++11(201103L).
>>  #if __has_warning("-Wimplicit-fallthrough") && __cplusplus >= 201103L
>>    #define VIXL_FALLTHROUGH() [[clang::fallthrough]] //NOLINT
>> +#elif defined(__GNUC__)
>> +  #define VIXL_FALLTHROUGH() __attribute__((fallthrough))
>>  #else
>>    #define VIXL_FALLTHROUGH() do {} while (0)
>>  #endif
>
>
> Even with the above patch, disas/libvixl raises a compiler warning for a
> fall through case. The patch below fixes that warning, but I am not sure
> whether a fall through is correct there.

This sort of question is probably best asked of upstream
VIXL, rather than here...

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]