Re: [Qemu-arm] [RFC 1/3] hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its: Don't abort on table save/restore

[Auger Eric]

Hi Peter,
On 12/10/2017 13:54, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 27 September 2017 at 15:56, Eric Auger <address@hidden> wrote:
>> The ITS is not properly reset at the moment. It is possible the
>> GITS_BASER<n>.valid is set and the in-kernel ITS caches are not
>> empty (list of devices, collections, LPIs) while data structures
>> in guest RAM are invalid/inconsistent.
>>
>> For instance, this happens after a guest shutdown -r now or a
>> system reset, if we save the state before the guest re-writes
>> the ITS registers or map devices, the table save ioctl may
>> produce a QEMU abort.
>>
>> Until there is a proper reset implemented, let's unplug the
>> consistency error checking.
>>
>> The reset issue will be fixed in subsequent patches.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <address@hidden>
>> Reported-by: wanghaibin <address@hidden>
> 
> When in particular does this cause an abort -- when we're
> trying to save the state in these edge cases, or when we're
> trying to restore it?
Both.

After a guest reset, device GITS_BASER<n> may point to an L1 device
table that is not valid anymore. In that case device table save IOTCL
returned -EINVAL and we aborted.

On restore we had a bug in case all data in the table is invalid. In
that case as well we currently abort.

 What does the kernel do -- is it just
> rejecting the attempt, or might it actually have done bad
> things to guest memory ?
On Save, in case the GITS_BASER points to an invalid linear device tree
table but the page still corresponds to a visible gfn window, this
memory could be overwritten by the kernel.

Thanks

Eric
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM
>