qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH for-2.10 3/5] target/arm: Rename cp15.c6_rgnr to p


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH for-2.10 3/5] target/arm: Rename cp15.c6_rgnr to pmsav7.rnr
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:03:05 -0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1

On 07/28/2017 05:42 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 27 July 2017 at 23:58, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> wrote:
On 07/27/2017 07:43 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:

On 07/27/2017 07:59 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:

[...]

-    u32p += env->cp15.c6_rgnr;
+    u32p += env->pmsav7.rnr;
       tlb_flush(CPU(cpu)); /* Mappings may have changed - purge! */
       *u32p = value;
   }
@@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo pmsav7_cp_reginfo[] = {
         .readfn = pmsav7_read, .writefn = pmsav7_write, .resetfn =
pmsav7_reset },
       { .name = "RGNR", .cp = 15, .crn = 6, .opc1 = 0, .crm = 2, .opc2 =
0,


"RGNR" -> "RNR"


Ah "RGNR" for -R and "RNR" for -M hmmm... still better keep the name
matching the field, "rnr".

It's a bit awkward, yes -- we're going to get a mismatch one way
or the other.

In this patch I wanted only to change the field name, not
anything else (it's already a bit borderline for 2.10).

Fine by me for what's worth. So either ways:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>


thanks
-- PMM




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]