qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v1 2/6] target/arm/translate.c: make DISAS_UPDATE


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v1 2/6] target/arm/translate.c: make DISAS_UPDATE match declared semantics
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 06:31:15 -1000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1

On 07/10/2017 06:13 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 10 July 2017 at 16:47, Alex Bennée <address@hidden> wrote:
DISAS_UPDATE should be used when the wider CPU state other than just
the PC has been updated and we should therefor exit the TCG runtime
and return to the main execution loop rather assuming DISAS_JUMP would
do that.

As some DISAS_UPDATE users may update the PC dynamically via a helper
we also push the updating to the PC to hhe call sites which set
->is_jmp to DISAS_UPDATE.

Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
---
  target/arm/translate.c | 11 +++++++----
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/translate.c b/target/arm/translate.c
index 0862f9e4aa..f9c4aee1b6 100644
--- a/target/arm/translate.c
+++ b/target/arm/translate.c
@@ -4430,6 +4430,7 @@ static void gen_msr_banked(DisasContext *s, int r, int 
sysm, int rn)
      tcg_temp_free_i32(tcg_tgtmode);
      tcg_temp_free_i32(tcg_regno);
      tcg_temp_free_i32(tcg_reg);
+    gen_set_pc_im(s, s->pc);
      s->is_jmp = DISAS_UPDATE;
  }

@@ -4452,6 +4453,7 @@ static void gen_mrs_banked(DisasContext *s, int r, int 
sysm, int rn)
      tcg_temp_free_i32(tcg_tgtmode);
      tcg_temp_free_i32(tcg_regno);
      store_reg(s, rn, tcg_reg);
+    gen_set_pc_im(s, s->pc);
      s->is_jmp = DISAS_UPDATE;
  }

@@ -8058,6 +8060,7 @@ static void gen_srs(DisasContext *s,
          tcg_temp_free_i32(tmp);
      }
      tcg_temp_free_i32(addr);
+    gen_set_pc_im(s, s->pc);
      s->is_jmp = DISAS_UPDATE;
  }

@@ -8146,6 +8149,7 @@ static void disas_arm_insn(DisasContext *s, unsigned int 
insn)
              /* setend */
              if (((insn >> 9) & 1) != !!(s->be_data == MO_BE)) {
                  gen_helper_setend(cpu_env);
+                gen_set_pc_im(s, s->pc);
                  s->is_jmp = DISAS_UPDATE;
              }
              return;
@@ -11619,6 +11623,7 @@ static void disas_thumb_insn(CPUARMState *env, 
DisasContext *s)
                  ARCH(6);
                  if (((insn >> 3) & 1) != !!(s->be_data == MO_BE)) {
                      gen_helper_setend(cpu_env);
+                    gen_set_pc_im(s, s->pc);
                      s->is_jmp = DISAS_UPDATE;
                  }
                  break;
@@ -12076,7 +12081,6 @@ void gen_intermediate_code(CPUARMState *env, 
TranslationBlock *tb)
              break;
          case DISAS_NEXT:
          case DISAS_UPDATE:
-            gen_set_pc_im(dc, dc->pc);
              /* fall through */
          default:
              /* FIXME: Single stepping a WFI insn will not halt the CPU. */
@@ -12095,12 +12099,11 @@ void gen_intermediate_code(CPUARMState *env, 
TranslationBlock *tb)
          case DISAS_NEXT:
              gen_goto_tb(dc, 1, dc->pc);
              break;
-        case DISAS_UPDATE:
-            gen_set_pc_im(dc, dc->pc);
-            /* fall through */
          case DISAS_JUMP:
              gen_goto_ptr();
              break;
+        case DISAS_UPDATE:
+            /* fall through */
          default:
              /* indicate that the hash table must be used to find the next TB 
*/
              tcg_gen_exit_tb(0);

I'm not a great fan of this, because we've taken five cases that
all want the same behaviour for ending the TB, and we've made
them handle part of it themselves rather than just letting
the end-of-TB code do it for them.

I agree.

Indeed, the fact that you've found 5 cases that are all the same suggests there *should* be common handling for them, and you're undoing that.

Enumeratiors are not expensive. If you found that none of the existing cases works for some case, then add another enumerator.


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]