qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v1 1/2] target-arm: Add the HSTR_EL2 register


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v1 1/2] target-arm: Add the HSTR_EL2 register
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 18:46:21 +0100

On 6 May 2016 at 19:11, Alistair Francis <address@hidden> wrote:
> Add the Hypervisor System Trap Register for EL2.
>
> This register is used early in the Linux boot and without it the kernel
> aborts with a "Synchronous Abort" error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <address@hidden>
> ---
>
>  target-arm/helper.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
> index 09638b2..65e8ff1 100644
> --- a/target-arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target-arm/helper.c
> @@ -3470,6 +3470,9 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo el3_no_el2_cp_reginfo[] = {
>        .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 6, .crm = 0, .opc2 = 4,
>        .access = PL2_RW, .accessfn = access_el3_aa32ns_aa64any,
>        .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
> +    { .name = "HSTR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
> +      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 1, .crm = 1, .opc2 = 3,
> +      .access = PL2_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
>      REGINFO_SENTINEL
>  };
>
> @@ -3703,6 +3706,10 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo el2_cp_reginfo[] = {
>        .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 6, .crm = 0, .opc2 = 4,
>        .access = PL2_RW,
>        .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.hpfar_el2) },
> +    { .name = "HSTR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
> +      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 1, .crm = 1, .opc2 = 3,
> +      .access = PL2_RW,
> +      .readfn = arm_cp_read_zero, .writefn = arm_cp_write_ignore, },
>      REGINFO_SENTINEL
>  };

Can we have the 32-bit version of the register too, please? (I think
it should be possible to do this with a STATE_BOTH stanza).

Can we have the el2_cp_reginfo implemented to be a reads-as-written
to a hstr_el2 field in the env->cp15 struct? That way we won't have
to come back to the regdef struct as and when we actually implement
the trap bits to do something...

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]