[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] abt.c: Permit NULL as the reaugment argument.

From: John Darrington
Subject: Re: [PATCH] abt.c: Permit NULL as the reaugment argument.
Date: Sun, 19 May 2019 21:03:38 +0200
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 11:24:20AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
     On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 02:48:45PM +0200, John Darrington wrote:
     > I wanted a binary tree structure, but didn't need the augmentation 
     > Okay to push this change?
     Would you mind saying a few words about why this is useful?  I would
     guess that, if reaugmentation is not needed, then it would make more
     sense to use another data structure, such as plain bt.[ch].

I guess you're right.  Bizarrely, I hadn't realized that bt.[ch]


Avoid eavesdropping.  Send strong encrypted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See or any PGP keyserver for public key.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]