Re: Move to Gtk+2.16 ?

[John Darrington]

Looking at recent bug reports (at address@hidden and on 3rd
party forums such as Debian) it seems that this issue is becoming 
urgent.  Unless anyone has any objections, I'm going to start a 
Gtk+-2.18 branch so as to avoid falling too far behind on this 
problem.

J'

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:33:17PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
     Ben Pfaff <address@hidden> writes:
     > I'll figure out how hard it would be to build GTK+ 2.18 for
     > backports.org.  If it's not too hard, then we could just advise
     > users to update their GTK+ version.
     
     It seems that it may not be that hard.  I'm going to give it a
     shot, anyhow, at least asking Debian's Glib and GTK+ library
     maintainers whether they know of a reason that it's a bad idea.
     -- 
     Ben Pfaff 
     http://benpfaff.org
     
     
     _______________________________________________
     pspp-dev mailing list
     address@hidden
     http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev

-- 
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature