[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: branch proposal (was: Re: Bug Fix vs. Development Branch)
From: |
Jason Stover |
Subject: |
Re: branch proposal (was: Re: Bug Fix vs. Development Branch) |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:12:52 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 09:44:37AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> OK, how about this then:
>
> - The "master" branch we are currently using remains the
> primary development branch. Anything that introduces a
> new feature is committed to this branch.
>
> - We create a new branch, tentatively named "stable", and
> initially branched away from where "master" is now.
> Anything that fixes a bug is committed to this branch.
>
> - Periodically, as necessary, we merge the stable branch
> into the master branch, so that the master branch also
> receives bug fixes.
>
> Comments?
Sounds OK to me.
- Bug Fix vs. Development Branch, John Darrington, 2008/08/11
- Re: Bug Fix vs. Development Branch, Ben Pfaff, 2008/08/11
- Re: Bug Fix vs. Development Branch, John Darrington, 2008/08/28
- Re: Bug Fix vs. Development Branch, Ben Pfaff, 2008/08/29
- branch proposal (was: Re: Bug Fix vs. Development Branch), Ben Pfaff, 2008/08/30
- Re: branch proposal (was: Re: Bug Fix vs. Development Branch),
Jason Stover <=
- Re: branch proposal (was: Re: Bug Fix vs. Development Branch), John Darrington, 2008/08/30
- Re: branch proposal, Ben Pfaff, 2008/08/31
- Re: branch proposal, John Darrington, 2008/08/31