pspp-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: strange...


From: unknown-1
Subject: Re: strange...
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:36:07 +0200

Hi

In fact this happend with the production version from pspp 0.6.0 as donwloaded from the GNU site.

Anybody an idea for a work around?

Have fun

2008/6/15 John Darrington
I noticed this before when compiling from the CVS tree.  But it
doesn't appear to happen when compiling from the tarball.  I don't
know why.

J'

On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 11:35:17PM +0200, unknown-1 wrote:
    Hi

    When I try to  compile pspp-0.6.0 with Mingw on the windows platform I get
    the errors:

    fatal-signal.c: In function `init_fatal_signal_set':
    fatal-signal.c:245: warning: implicit declaration of function `sigemptyset'
    fatal-signal.c:248: warning: implicit declaration of function `sigaddset'
    fatal-signal.c: In function `block_fatal_signals':
    fatal-signal.c:259: warning: implicit declaration of function `sigprocmask'
    fatal-signal.c:259: error: `SIG_BLOCK' undeclared (first use in this
    function)
    fatal-signal.c:259: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
    fatal-signal.c:259: error: for each function it appears in.)
    fatal-signal.c: In function `unblock_fatal_signals':
    fatal-signal.c:267: error: `SIG_UNBLOCK' undeclared (first use in this
    function)
    make[3]: *** [fatal-signal.lo] Error 1
    make[3]: Leaving directory `g:/pspp-0.6.0/gl'

    Is this solvable?

    Have fun

    _______________________________________________
    pspp-dev mailing list
    address@hidden
    http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev


--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIVGZAimdxnC3oJ7MRAjPjAJwMIP4Oabw8pMUC0pOkj9GUJMUxGgCeKgT/
w+C25F1MxorCzhV9ju6gp4U=
=J2Z3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]