Re: [patch #5209] Proposed casefile changes

[Ben Pfaff]

Ben Pfaff <address@hidden> writes:

> John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:15:33AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>      
>>      Please create a "struct casefile_class" and move the function pointers
>>      in "struct casefile" into it.  This better abstracts the casefile
>>      implementations and saves time and memory because only a single
>>      pointer needs to be set when creating a casefile.  (This is like the
>>      way the output drivers work.)
>>
>> OK.  It's not quite that simple, because different subclasses will
>> have different  implementations.  But I can do that.
>
> I'm not quite sure what you mean.  Can you elaborate?  (Perhaps
> this will clear up your answer to the following comment as well.)

By "following comment" I meant one that I snipped, not the one
that I quoted afterward.
-- 
Ben Pfaff 
email: address@hidden
web: http://benpfaff.org