proofreaders
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

t-ur-bo cha-rge your paychecktimeThu, 21 Oct 2004 23:38:49 -06009


From: HigginsDawn
Subject: t-ur-bo cha-rge your paychecktimeThu, 21 Oct 2004 23:38:49 -06009
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:38:49 -0700

 

Un. iver.sity Di.plo. mas Available without attending any classes!

Think you got shortchanged in school?

Degrees available: Bachelors, MBA, Masters, Doctorate (PhD)


But no person whose mode of thought is logical can rest satisfied with this condition of things. He asks: ?How does it come that certain reference-bodies (or their states of motion) are given priority over other reference-bodies (or their states of motion)? What is the reason for this preference? In order to show clearly what I mean by this question, I shall make use of a comparison. 2 Of course we must refer the process of the propagation of light (and indeed every other process) to a rigid reference-body (co-ordinate system). As such a system let us again choose our embankment. We shall imagine the air above it to have been removed. If a ray of light be sent along the embankment, we see from the above that the tip of the ray will be transmitted with the velocity c relative to the embankment. Now let us suppose that our railway carriage is again travelling along the railway lines with the velocity v, and that its direction is the same as that of the ray of light, but its velocity of course much less. Let us inquire about the velocity of propagation of the ray of light relative to the carriage. It is obvious that we can here apply the consideration of the previous section, since the ray of light plays the part of the man walking along relatively to the carriage. The velocity W of the man relative to the embankment is here replaced by the velocity of light relative to the embankment. w is the required velocity of light with respect to the carriage, and we have w = c - v. THERE is hardly a simpler law in physics than that according to which light is propagated in empty space. Every child at school knows, or believes he knows, that this propagation takes place in straight lines with a velocity c = 300,000 km./sec. At all events we know with great exactness that this velocity is the same for all colours, because if this were not the case, the minimum of emission would not be observed simultaneously for different colours during the eclipse of a fixed star by its dark neighbour. By means of similar considerations based on observations of double stars, the Dutch astronomer De Sitter was also able to show that the velocity of propagation of light cannot depend on the velocity of motion of the body emitting the light. The assumption that this velocity of propagation is dependent on the direction ?in space? is in itself improbable. 1

 UNSUBSCRIBE



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]