poke-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] doc: remove non-existent limitations regarding integral stru


From: Jose E. Marchesi
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: remove non-existent limitations regarding integral structs
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 20:39:30 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

OK for both master and maint/poke-3.
Thanks.

> 2023-07-06  Mohammad-Reza Nabipoor  <mnabipoor@gnu.org>
>
>       * doc/poke.texi (Integral Structs): Update.
> ---
>  ChangeLog     | 4 ++++
>  doc/poke.texi | 9 +--------
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
> index 73a49072..cd17e6d8 100644
> --- a/ChangeLog
> +++ b/ChangeLog
> @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
> +2023-07-06  Mohammad-Reza Nabipoor  <mnabipoor@gnu.org>
> +
> +     * doc/poke.texi (Integral Structs): Update.
> +
>  2023-07-20  Jose E. Marchesi  <jemarch@gnu.org>
>  
>       * doc/poke.texi (Scripts): Add missing `open' to example.
> diff --git a/doc/poke.texi b/doc/poke.texi
> index e7bcd023..311141b4 100644
> --- a/doc/poke.texi
> +++ b/doc/poke.texi
> @@ -11918,19 +11918,12 @@ others to be lifted eventually:
>  
>  @itemize @minus
>  @item
> -There are no integral unions.  This is a fundamental limitation and
> -will most likely stay like that.
> -@item
>  Integral structs can only have integral fields.  This includes
> -offsets.
> +offsets and integral structs.
>  @item
>  No labels are allowed in the fields of integral structs.  This is not
>  a fundamental limitation, and may be supported at some point.
>  @item
> -No integral structs are supported inside other integral structs.  This
> -is purely because of laziness on my part.  This will be eventually
> -supported.
> -@item
>  No optional fields are supported in integral structs.  Support for
>  this is actually partially implemented (the mapper supports them but
>  not the writer) and most probably will be completed one of these days.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]