Re: pvm.jitter patch for no-threading

[Jose E. Marchesi]

Hi Luca.

> This is a *minimal* set of changes required to make no-threading work;
> the current code could become more efficient, but with these changes it
> is correct.
>
> As you can see the only required modifications are uses of the new
> attribute "branching", and some function/global wrappings.  In the case
> of I/O instructions which are high-latency anyway, instead of worrying
> about wrapping globals, I have opted to make the instructions
> non-relocatable.
>
> This on my system gives zero test suite failures.  You can check on my
> private branch lucasaiu/poke-no-threading .

The patch itself looks ok, but for:

-  pk_term_class
-  pk_term_end_class
-  pk_printf
+#  pk_term_class
+#  pk_term_end_class
+#  pk_printf

Why commenting these out instead of removing them?

Also, there are a few commented-out:

# non-relocatable

Do we need these?