poke-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] pickles: Add btf-dump.pk BTF utility pickle


From: Jose E. Marchesi
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pickles: Add btf-dump.pk BTF utility pickle
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 15:13:51 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)

> Hi David.
>
>> +fun btf_dump_int = (BTF_Int i) void:
>> +  {
>> +    printf (" offset=%v bits=%v %s%s%s",
>> +            i.offset#b, i.bits#b,
>> +            i.signed_p ? "SIGNED " : "",
>> +            i.bool_p ? "BOOL " : "", i.char_p ? "CHAR " : "");
>> +  }
>
> Every time I see something like i.offset#b or i.bits#b I wonder whether
> the elements i.offset and i.bits shouldn't be rather be offsets instead
> of integral values, i.e:
>
> type BTF_Int =
>   struct uint<32>
>   {
>     uint<4>;
>     uint<1>;
>     uint<1> bool_p;
>     uint<1> char_p;
>     uint<1> signed_p;
>     offset<uint<8>,b> offset;
>     uint<8>;
>     offset<uint<8>,b> bits;
>
>     /* XXX turn `encoding' into a nested integral struct once we
>        support it in the compiler.  */
>     method encoding = uint<4>:
>     {
>       return bool_p:::char_p:::signed_p;
>     }
>   };
>
> Would the above be appropriate?
> Other than that, this is great stuff! :)

Forgot to mention I pushed this patch.  Still recommend you to consider
changing `offset' and `bits' in BTF_Int to offsets in a subsequent
patch.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]