[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Plex86-devel] speed for Windows 95 ?

From: Robert Grasso
Subject: Re: [Plex86-devel] speed for Windows 95 ?
Date: 30 Dec 2002 00:17:04 +0100

Thanks for the informations and for forwarding the email. I'll wait for
the improvements. About bochs, I suppose that you should not bother.
There must be some bug with my configuration, and I don't want to spend
much time on it : I am not skilled enough, I am afraid of losing too
much time in testings. Of course, there may be (who knows ?) some
interesting information that we are going to miss ...

Robert Grasso
UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because 
  that would also stop you from doing clever things. -- Doug Gwyn

On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 22:22, Eric Laberge wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> Aloha!
> You can expect things to go WAY faster on the Bochs side in short term. Kevin 
> is implementing parts of the Plex86 core to Bochs, and reports having speed 
> of 90% of the host on some tests. It does not seem like his e-mail has been 
> received on this list, I'll redirect it here.
> If both project could at least share a clean architecture and be documented, 
> you can bet things would improve.
> I don't understand your problem with Bochs, though. 2.0 is reported to even 
> run Windows XP.
> - -- 
> Eric Laberge
> ICQ: 1261355
> MSN: address@hidden
> Jabber: address@hidden
> GCS/M/S d-(++) s-: a-- C++(++++) UL+++>$ !P L++ E--- W++ N+ w++ !O M
> !V PS PE Y PGP-(+++) t++(-) X- R* tv+ b+ DI+++  D+ G e+>+++++ h! r--
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> iD8DBQE+D2eU1Q3tcr/gnPMRAjIVAKCk66YorsMCKh4wp62mad3Xu2SYPACeIG5j
> N6neK4ykZFzYNChceQtKJTw=
> =H1SG
> _______________________________________________
> Plex86-devel mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]