Re: [Plex86-devel] speed for Windows 95 ?

[Robert Grasso]

Thanks for the informations and for forwarding the email. I'll wait for
the improvements. About bochs, I suppose that you should not bother.
There must be some bug with my configuration, and I don't want to spend
much time on it : I am not skilled enough, I am afraid of losing too
much time in testings. Of course, there may be (who knows ?) some
interesting information that we are going to miss ...

-- 
Robert Grasso
@home
---
UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because 
  that would also stop you from doing clever things. -- Doug Gwyn

On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 22:22, Eric Laberge wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Aloha!
> 
> You can expect things to go WAY faster on the Bochs side in short term. Kevin 
> is implementing parts of the Plex86 core to Bochs, and reports having speed 
> of 90% of the host on some tests. It does not seem like his e-mail has been 
> received on this list, I'll redirect it here.
> 
> If both project could at least share a clean architecture and be documented, 
> you can bet things would improve.
> 
> I don't understand your problem with Bochs, though. 2.0 is reported to even 
> run Windows XP.
> 
> - -- 
> Eric Laberge
> ICQ: 1261355
> MSN: address@hidden
> Jabber: address@hidden
> 
> GCS/M/S d-(++) s-: a-- C++(++++) UL+++>$ !P L++ E--- W++ N+ w++ !O M
> !V PS PE Y PGP-(+++) t++(-) X- R* tv+ b+ DI+++  D+ G e+>+++++ h! r--
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE+D2eU1Q3tcr/gnPMRAjIVAKCk66YorsMCKh4wp62mad3Xu2SYPACeIG5j
> N6neK4ykZFzYNChceQtKJTw=
> =H1SG
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Plex86-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/plex86-devel