[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [platform-testers] Release candidate mpc-1.3.0rc1
From: |
Paul Zimmermann |
Subject: |
Re: [platform-testers] Release candidate mpc-1.3.0rc1 |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Nov 2022 15:34:39 +0100 |
thank you all for your reports.
We are able to reproduce the tagm issue (even on 64-bit machines with larger
precision). This issue is under investigation.
For the teta issue, we are unable to reproduce it under 32-bit Linux.
Please can you investigate at which line of teta.c the variable eta
becomes 0?
ok = mpcb_can_round (j, 291, 234, MPC_RNDNN);
ok &= (re == -262537412640768000L && im == 1);
ok &= (re == 1728 && im == 1);
I suspect the 2nd line. Maybe we should write -262537412640768000LL?
Best regards,
Paul
> From: sisyphus <sisyphus359@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 23:18:10 +1100
>
>
> [1:multipart/alternative Hide]
>
>
> [1/1:text/plain Show]
>
>
> [1/2:text/html Hide Save:noname (1kB)]
>
> Hi Andreas,
> On Windows 11, using 32-bit versions of gcc-11.3.0, gcc-12.1.0 and
> gcc-12.2.0, I'm seeing the same 2 failing test programs as already reported
> by Trizen.
> The test suite log is attached.
>
> With 64-bit versions of the same compilers on the same system, it's only the
> teta.exe program that fails.
> For those 64-bit failures of teta.exe, the test-suite log provides the same
> (minimal) information as provided for the 32-bit builds.
>
> Cheers,
> Rob
>
> [2:application/octet-stream Show Save:test-suite-1130-stat32.log (5kB)]
>