platform-testers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [platform-testers] new snapshot available: coreutils-8.31.90-cc4c.ta


From: Marius Bakke
Subject: Re: [platform-testers] new snapshot available: coreutils-8.31.90-cc4c.tar.xz
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 14:44:33 +0100
User-agent: Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

Pádraig Brady <address@hidden> writes:

> On 03/03/2020 17:15, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> Pádraig Brady <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>>>> It builds fine, and reproducibly on Guix System (current master;
>>>> ba8992d28b1616d05b7cb04ef032944c5d19cd5a); build log attached.
>>>>
>>>> Guix has been disabling tests/misc/env-S.pl
>>>>
>>>>       ;; This test hits the 127 character shebang limit in the build
>>>>       ;; environment due to the way "env -S" splits arguments into
>>>>       ;; shebangs.  Note that "env-S-script.sh" works around this
>>>>       ;; specific issue, but "env-S.pl" is not adjusted for build
>>>>       ;; environments with long prefixes (/tmp/guix-build-...).
>>>>       (substitute* "Makefile"
>>>>         (("^.*tests/misc/env-S.pl.*$") ""))
>>>
>>> I don't immediately see the issue with env-S.pl TBH
>> 
>> The problem with tests/misc/env-S.pl is that it needs "env"
>> pre-installed and residing in either /bin or /usr/bin, which do not
>> exist in the Guix build container.
>> 
>>  From running it through 'strace':
>> 
>> 430   write(2, "split -S:  'A=B \\\\c'\n", 21) = 21
>> 430   write(2, " into:    'A=B'\n", 16) = 16
>> 430   write(2, "cleaning environ\n", 17) = 17
>> 430   write(2, "setenv:   A=B\n", 14)   = 14
>> 430   write(2, "executing: env\n", 15)  = 15
>> 430   write(2, "   arg[0]= 'env'\n", 17) = 17
>> 430   execve("/bin/env", ["env"], 0x22ce580 /* 1 var */) = -1 ENOENT (No 
>> such file or directory)
>> 430   execve("/usr/bin/env", ["env"], 0x22ce580 /* 1 var */) = -1 ENOENT (No 
>> such file or directory)
>> 430   write(2, "env: ", 5)              = 5
>> 430   write(2, "'env'", 5)              = 5
>> 430   write(2, ": No such file or directory", 27) = 27
>> 430   write(2, "\n", 1)                 = 1
>> 430   close(1)                          = 0
>> 430   close(2)                          = 0
>> 430   exit_group(127)                   = ?
>> 430   +++ exited with 127 +++
>> 
>> I can't figure out where /bin and /usr/bin comes from.  'env' is
>> available on PATH during the build, but that does not suffice here.
>
> I don't see /bin/env being used here.

Really?  Can you send a trace of 'make check TESTS=tests/misc/env-S.pl'?
Curious how it is supposed to work...

> Perhaps PATH is being adjusted in your environment.

What do you mean?

The build process really only does "./configure; make; make check", we
do not patch coreutils apart from a few "/bin/sh" references in the test
suite.

> It's a good clue anyway, so thanks for the info.
> I don't think this warrants holding up the release though.

It is not a new regression so it probably should not hold the release
indeed.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]