[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Intentional code?
From: |
David Philippi |
Subject: |
Re: Intentional code? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 22:39:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.1 |
On Friday 11 October 2002 22:19, Ingo Ruhnke wrote:
> > > if (this == &old);
Argl, only when looking at the CVS message I finally recognised what Gervase
was initially talking about - the >;<. Next time write it like
if (this == &old);
^
and even someone as blind as me will recognize what's the problem. ;-)
Bye David
- Re: Intentional code?, (continued)
- Re: Intentional code?, David Philippi, 2002/10/11
- Re: Intentional code?, Neil Hotmail, 2002/10/11
- XMLhelper::parse_bool needed?, Neil Hotmail, 2002/10/11
- Re: XMLhelper::parse_bool needed?, David Philippi, 2002/10/11
- Re: XMLhelper::parse_bool needed?, Neil Hotmail, 2002/10/11
- Re: XMLhelper::parse_bool needed?, Ingo Ruhnke, 2002/10/11
- Re: Intentional code?, Neil Hotmail, 2002/10/11
- Re: Intentional code?, David Philippi, 2002/10/11
- Re: Intentional code?, Ingo Ruhnke, 2002/10/11
- Re: Intentional code?, David Philippi, 2002/10/11
- Re: Intentional code?,
David Philippi <=