[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows Specific Fixes
From: |
David Philippi |
Subject: |
Re: Windows Specific Fixes |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Oct 2002 21:48:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.1 |
On Sunday 06 October 2002 21:30, Neil Hotmail wrote:
> It may be called something else on Linux - thats the C++ standard for you.
> If this is the case then it might be best to include it in an equivalent
> place to where it is on Linux, i.e. in the project file/windows headers or
> wherever.
No, <algorithm> is a STL header. The problem is that such a header might be
included by <vector> in Linux and not in Windows. Then a Linux user won't
notice that <algorithm> is required at all.
> This fix should probably not be applied without further testing - the
> current Pingus's copy on my machine won't play levels (problem posted to
> list) so I can't test the levels aspect of it - which is obviously quite
> important.
Well, I did apply it but it's not much work to remove it again if it causes
problems.
Bye David
- tester, John & Marsha Hinds, 2002/10/06
- Re: tester, Neil Hotmail, 2002/10/06
- Re: tester, David Philippi, 2002/10/06
- Windows Specific Fixes, Neil Hotmail, 2002/10/06
- Re: Windows Specific Fixes, David Philippi, 2002/10/06
- Re: Windows Specific Fixes, Neil Hotmail, 2002/10/06
- Re: Windows Specific Fixes,
David Philippi <=
- Compiling cvs (was: Re: Windows Specific Fixes), Tomas Blaha, 2002/10/06
- Re: Compiling cvs (was: Re: Windows Specific Fixes), David Philippi, 2002/10/06
- Re: Compiling cvs (was: Re: Windows Specific Fixes), Tomas Blaha, 2002/10/06
- Re: Compiling cvs (was: Re: Windows Specific Fixes), David Philippi, 2002/10/06
- Re: Compiling cvs (was: Re: Windows Specific Fixes), Ingo Ruhnke, 2002/10/06
- Re: Compiling cvs (was: Re: Windows Specific Fixes), David Philippi, 2002/10/07
- Re: Windows Specific Fixes, David Philippi, 2002/10/06
- Re: Windows Specific Fixes, Neil Hotmail, 2002/10/06